2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2011.05.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wettability determination of core samples through visual rock and fluid imaging during fluid injection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diameter ranges of pores, cavities and fractures are 0.099-0.181 mm, 1.161-1.657 mm and 0.325-0.492 mm, respectively. The maximum allowable stress can up to 10 MPa The contact angle of these micromodels is 36.4°-36.7° (water-wet), which is similar to the water-wet carbonate rocks in study area [37].…”
Section: Micromodel Fabrication Based On Microelectronic Photolithogrsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The diameter ranges of pores, cavities and fractures are 0.099-0.181 mm, 1.161-1.657 mm and 0.325-0.492 mm, respectively. The maximum allowable stress can up to 10 MPa The contact angle of these micromodels is 36.4°-36.7° (water-wet), which is similar to the water-wet carbonate rocks in study area [37].…”
Section: Micromodel Fabrication Based On Microelectronic Photolithogrsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…When the target water saturation is close to the residual value (defined as the minimum saturation that is possible to be reached by following the drainage curve), this simple method is not efficient anymore. Indeed, because of the wettability of the medium, the wetting fluid will be trapped by capillary forces while the non-wetting one will flow between the pockets of the wetting fluid [14]. Accordingly, reaching water saturations close to the residual saturation needs a very high ratio between the two flow rates (1000 or more), which is not compatible with the technical limitations of the experimental set-up (mainly the limited volume of the pumps bodies).…”
Section: Relative Permeabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wetting-drying cycle refers to the process in which the rock mass is continuously subjected to repeated cycles of soaking, dewatering, soaking, and dewatering under rainfall or groundwater conditions [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. In this process, the physical and mechanical parameters of the rock mass are continuously weakened, the strength is continuously reduced, and the creep aging effect is continuously intensified [20][21][22][23][24][25][26], with the increase of time, under certain conditions, it may even cause accidents such as engineering instability and failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%