2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b03752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wetting and Dewetting Transitions on Submerged Superhydrophobic Surfaces with Hierarchical Structures

Abstract: The wetting transition on submersed superhydrophobic surfaces with hierarchical structures and the influence of trapped air on superhydrophobic stability are predicted based on the thermodynamics and mechanical analyses. The dewetting transition on the hierarchically structured surfaces is investigated, and two necessary thermodynamic conditions and a mechanical balance condition for dewetting transition are proposed. The corresponding thermodynamic phase diagram of reversible transition and the critical rever… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 25–27 ] Additionally, the surface chemical composition and geometric morphology can also affect surface wettability. [ 28–36 ] By adjusting the surfaces with wettable gradients (such as structural gradients and chemical gradients), [ 37–39 ] asymmetric structures [ 40–44 ] or bioinspired structures, [ 45–51 ] a droplet spreading on these surfaces can be well manipulated. However, singly structural or chemical gradient surfaces can just carry out the conversion of surface wetting properties between hydrophobic and hydrophilic (or between hydrophobic and super‐hydrophilic) but not favor the droplet to spread or move over a long distance due to the influence of the intrinsic contact angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 25–27 ] Additionally, the surface chemical composition and geometric morphology can also affect surface wettability. [ 28–36 ] By adjusting the surfaces with wettable gradients (such as structural gradients and chemical gradients), [ 37–39 ] asymmetric structures [ 40–44 ] or bioinspired structures, [ 45–51 ] a droplet spreading on these surfaces can be well manipulated. However, singly structural or chemical gradient surfaces can just carry out the conversion of surface wetting properties between hydrophobic and hydrophilic (or between hydrophobic and super‐hydrophilic) but not favor the droplet to spread or move over a long distance due to the influence of the intrinsic contact angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surfaces with microstructures such as micro-pillars and micropores have some applications in fabrication of superhydrophobic or superhydrophilic surfaces and oil/water inside the rocks [23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. Yuan et al [24,[30][31] elegantly studied the wettability of patterned surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was noticeable that the interface of water and the captured gas reached to a state of equilibrium and force balance. According to Laplace equation, the pressure balance of liquid/vapor interface underwater at equilibrium state can be deduced asPnormalVP0PnormalL=2γLVrwhere P V is the pressure of the trapped air among surface microstructures, P 0 is the ambient gas pressure, P L is the water pressure correlated with the depth from atmospheric water surface, γ LV is the interfacial free energy between the liquid–vapor, r is the curvature radius of liquid/vapor curve interface (Figure 5e). The pressure difference, Δ P , between P 0 and P V can be deduced from Equation ΔP=PnormalVP0=PnormalL+2γLVr…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%