Nanotechnologies for Synthetic Super Non‐Wetting Surfaces 2014
DOI: 10.1002/9781119015093.ch2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wetting on Heterogeneous Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No changes in contact angle were observed as temperature was increased for micelle modified surfaces. We are aware that the wetting of rough, heterogeneous surfaces is a complex function of chemical interactions between surface and fluid components as well as topographical parameters (e.g., roughness, surface coverage) and so unambiguous interpretation of the observed wettability for all samples is difficult here. Nonetheless, our contact angle measurements demonstrate that the conformation of ELP block copolymers upon adsorption (i.e., unimers vs micelles) can substantially affect the thermally responsive properties of the adsorbed polypeptide layers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No changes in contact angle were observed as temperature was increased for micelle modified surfaces. We are aware that the wetting of rough, heterogeneous surfaces is a complex function of chemical interactions between surface and fluid components as well as topographical parameters (e.g., roughness, surface coverage) and so unambiguous interpretation of the observed wettability for all samples is difficult here. Nonetheless, our contact angle measurements demonstrate that the conformation of ELP block copolymers upon adsorption (i.e., unimers vs micelles) can substantially affect the thermally responsive properties of the adsorbed polypeptide layers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%