2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11785-007-0034-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weyl–Titchmarsh Function of an Abstract Boundary Value Problem, Operator Colligations, and Linear Systems with Boundary Control

Abstract: The paper defines the Weyl-Titchmarsh function for an abstract boundary value problem and shows that it coincides with the transfer function of some explicitly described linear boundary control system. On the ground of obtained results we explore interplay among boundary value problems, operator colligations, and the linear systems theory that suggests an approach to the study of boundary value problems based on the open systems theory founded in works of M. S. Livšic. Examples of boundary value problems for p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar Krein type resolvent formulas can also be found in [9,13,25,26,[47][48][49][50]. The fact that the difference of the resolvents belongs to some von Neumann-Schatten class depending on the dimension of the space is well known and goes back to M.S.…”
Section: Proposition 32mentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar Krein type resolvent formulas can also be found in [9,13,25,26,[47][48][49][50]. The fact that the difference of the resolvents belongs to some von Neumann-Schatten class depending on the dimension of the space is well known and goes back to M.S.…”
Section: Proposition 32mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The minus sign in (1.2) is used for technical reasons. It turns out that the operator function λ → Q(λ) is a generalized Q-function in the sense of Definition 2.2 and an explicit variant of Krein's formula for the resolvents of A D and A N is obtained in Theorem 3.4, see also [9,13,25,26,[47][48][49][50] for more general problems. In particular, in the case n = 2 it follows from results due to M.S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here in the second equality we take advantage of the fact that Γ soft 0 γ soft (z) = I. Furthermore, using the representation (see [13,34])…”
Section: Asymptotic Behaviour Of the Resolvent (Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stiff does not depend on ε due to the choice of Γ stiff 1 , see(7) and Section 4.1. On the other hand,[34] provides us with the representation M (τ ),stiff ε z (0) = Π * stiff Π stiff , and hence B…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We point out that for a constant selfadjoint boundary condition τ the solution operatorà coincides with T τ in (1.3) and the above formula reduces to the well-known Krein formula for canonical selfadjoint extensions in L 2 (Ω) of the minimal operator associated to , cf. [1,8,16,[37][38][39]44,[56][57][58][59][60]. The proof of our main result Theorem 4.2 is based on a coupling technique of ordinary and generalized boundary triples which differs from the methods applied in earlier papers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%