Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
PurposeThis study aims to investigate the interobserver variability in the quantitative assessment of liver fat content using ultrasound attenuation imaging technology (USAT).MethodsThis prospective, single‐center study included 96 adult patients who were either diagnosed with or suspected of having metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease. Independent observers, blinded to each other's assessments, evaluated hepatic steatosis visually and through USAT measurements. Separate measurements were taken at five intercostal and subcostal sites, and the median values of these measurements were recorded. The correlation between USAT measurements and visual steatosis grades was examined using Spearman's correlation test. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman analysis were used to evaluate the interobserver variability of USAT measurements.ResultsInterobserver agreement for USAT measurements was excellent for the intercostal examination and good for the subcostal examination (p < 0.001). Body mass index did not significantly affect the level of interobserver agreement. Interobserver variability in Bland–Altman plots of USAT measurements was within the 95% limits of agreement. USAT measurements correlated very strongly with the visual degree of hepatic steatosis, both intercostal and subcostal (p < 0.001). USAT measurements were also significantly different between different visual degrees of hepatic steatosis (p < 0.001).ConclusionIn the assessment of hepatic steatosis, USAT measurements obtained from the intercostal space showed excellent agreement in terms of interobserver reproducibility.
PurposeThis study aims to investigate the interobserver variability in the quantitative assessment of liver fat content using ultrasound attenuation imaging technology (USAT).MethodsThis prospective, single‐center study included 96 adult patients who were either diagnosed with or suspected of having metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease. Independent observers, blinded to each other's assessments, evaluated hepatic steatosis visually and through USAT measurements. Separate measurements were taken at five intercostal and subcostal sites, and the median values of these measurements were recorded. The correlation between USAT measurements and visual steatosis grades was examined using Spearman's correlation test. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman analysis were used to evaluate the interobserver variability of USAT measurements.ResultsInterobserver agreement for USAT measurements was excellent for the intercostal examination and good for the subcostal examination (p < 0.001). Body mass index did not significantly affect the level of interobserver agreement. Interobserver variability in Bland–Altman plots of USAT measurements was within the 95% limits of agreement. USAT measurements correlated very strongly with the visual degree of hepatic steatosis, both intercostal and subcostal (p < 0.001). USAT measurements were also significantly different between different visual degrees of hepatic steatosis (p < 0.001).ConclusionIn the assessment of hepatic steatosis, USAT measurements obtained from the intercostal space showed excellent agreement in terms of interobserver reproducibility.
ObjectivesMetabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the most prevalent liver disorder in Western countries, with approximately 20%–30% of the MASLD patients progressing to severe stages. There is an urgent need for noninvasive, cost‐effective, widely accessible, and precise biomarkers to evaluate liver steatosis. This study aims to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of a novel reference frequency method‐based ultrasound attenuation coefficient estimation (ACE) in both fundamental (RFM‐ACE‐FI) and harmonic (RFM‐ACE‐HI) imaging for detecting and grading liver steatosis.MethodsAn Institutional Review Board‐approved prospective study was carried out between December 2018 and October 2022. A total number of 130 subjects were enrolled in the study. The correlation between RFM‐ACE‐HI values and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI‐PDFF), as well as between RFM‐ACE‐FI values and MRI‐PDFF were calculated. The diagnostic performance of RFM‐ACE‐FI and RFM‐ACE‐HI was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, as compared to MRI‐PDFF. The reproducibility of RFM‐ACE‐HI was assessed by interobserver agreement between two sonographers.ResultsA strong correlation was observed between RFM‐ACE‐HI and MRI‐PDFF, with R = 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.83–0.92; P < .001), while the correlation between RFM‐ACE‐FI and MRI‐PDFF was R = 0.65 (95% CI: 0.50–0.76; P < .001). The area under the ROC (AUROC) curve for RFM‐ACE‐HI in staging liver steatosis grades of S ≥ 1 and S ≥ 2 was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91–0.99; P < .001) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.93–1.00; P < .001), respectively, and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.65–0.85) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70–0.88) for RFM‐ACE‐FI, respectively. Great reproducibility was achieved for RFM‐ACE‐HI, with an interobserver agreement of R = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.94–0.99; P < .001).ConclusionsThe novel RFM‐ACE‐HI method offered high liver steatosis diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility, which has important clinical implications for early disease intervention and treatment evaluation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.