The Handbook of Hispanic Linguistics 2012
DOI: 10.1002/9781118228098.ch25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wh‐Movement: Interrogatives, Exclamatives, and Relatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data above point to the inescapable conclusion that inversion is not a feature confined to (wh-)interrogatives (Francom 2012), but a feature of preposed focal phrases more generally. Moreover, it follows from the generalization that focus is the culprit of inversion that the source of inversion in focal contexts including whinterrogatives and wh-exclamatives must be one and the same.…”
Section: The Contentious Analysis Of Obligatory Subject-verb Inversio...mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The data above point to the inescapable conclusion that inversion is not a feature confined to (wh-)interrogatives (Francom 2012), but a feature of preposed focal phrases more generally. Moreover, it follows from the generalization that focus is the culprit of inversion that the source of inversion in focal contexts including whinterrogatives and wh-exclamatives must be one and the same.…”
Section: The Contentious Analysis Of Obligatory Subject-verb Inversio...mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In other configurations, the VS order is used in marked contexts, notably when the subject is focused (Olarrea, 2012 ; Ordóñez, 2000 ; Zubizarreta, 1998 ). Furthermore, the VS order is typically observed—and appears to be obligatory in European Spanish—in syntactic configurations like wh-questions and exclamatives (Francom, 2012 ). In relative clauses, which are the focus of our study, both orders are possible, with VS being unmarked and SV typically being used for subject topicalization (Gutiérrez-Bravo, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%