2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What a body can do: Rethinking body functionality through a feminist materialist disability lens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As many critical access scholars have noted, the stresses and challenges of individually navigating a world designed for non-disabled people and of trying to carve out accessible pathways through it wears down/wears out those users who embody difference before they even arrive in a space (Ahmed, 2019; Chandler et al, 2021; Jones et al, 2022; Rice, Riley, et al, 2021). Disabled people commonly confront this scenario in neoliberal ableist jurisdictions such as Canada, where legislation and policy tend to download responsibility for access onto individuals who require it (Rice, Chandler, et al, 2021; Rice et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As many critical access scholars have noted, the stresses and challenges of individually navigating a world designed for non-disabled people and of trying to carve out accessible pathways through it wears down/wears out those users who embody difference before they even arrive in a space (Ahmed, 2019; Chandler et al, 2021; Jones et al, 2022; Rice, Riley, et al, 2021). Disabled people commonly confront this scenario in neoliberal ableist jurisdictions such as Canada, where legislation and policy tend to download responsibility for access onto individuals who require it (Rice, Chandler, et al, 2021; Rice et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many participants identified access barriers as limiting their use of technology. Although participants tended to situate the problem of access as a problem of their aging bodies (mentioning both age-related and non-age-related cognitive challenges, mental illness/psychiatric diagnoses/mental difference, physical disabilities), disability studies and critical access perspectives teach us that disability emerges from the fitting or misfitting of bodies with environments, rather than bodies alone (Changfoot et al, 2021; Changfoot & Rice, 2020; Jones et al, 2022; Rice, Bailey, & Cook, 2021; Rice, Riley, et al, 2021). This misfitting limited older adults’ capacity to engage with the arts through digital technology but heightened their desire for engagement.…”
Section: Preliminary Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would be desirable that the messages in social media depict more inclusive models of functionality, broadening the construct beyond the normative view of physical abilities and the narrow focus on physical fitness and performance (Rice et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, although functionality appreciation is not restricted to able-bodied individuals (Alleva and Tylka, 2021), an important area of future study will be further investigating the experiences of individuals with disabilities or body differences, as they may have a different relationship to body functionality (Vinoski Thomas et al, 2019;Rice et al, 2021). Indeed, qualitative research shows that women with visible physical disabilities have high levels of concern about the appearance of their bodies while performing body functions, including concerns about "looking disabled" to self and others (Vinoski Thomas et al, 2019).…”
Section: Functionality Appreciation Correlatesmentioning
confidence: 99%