This study examined sexual prejudice and masculine gender role stress as mediators of the relations between male gender norms and anger and aggression toward gay men. Participants were 150 selfidentified heterosexual men who completed measures of adherence to male gender role norms, sexual prejudice, masculine gender role stress, and state anger. Participants then viewed a video depicting intimate relationship behavior between two gay men, reported state anger a second time, and competed in a laboratory aggression task against either a heterosexual or a gay male. Results indicated that adherence to the antifemininity norm exerted an indirect effect, primarily through sexual prejudice, on increases in anger. Adherence to the status and antifemininity norms exerted indirect effects, also through sexual prejudice, on physical aggression toward the gay, but not the heterosexual, male. Findings provide the first multivariate evidence for determinants of aggression toward gay men motivated by gender role enforcement.
KeywordsAggressive Behavior; Homosexuality (Attitudes Toward); Male Homosexuality; Prejudice; Masculinity Numerous theories have been advanced to better understand the motives that facilitate aggression toward sexual minorities (for a review, see Franklin, 2000;Parrott, 2008). Specifically, extant literature suggests that male-perpetrated aggression toward gay men functions to enforce traditional gender norms (Hamner, 1992;Kite & Whitley, 1998), prove one's heterosexuality and masculinity to other men (Franklin, 2000;Kimmel, 2000), satisfy thrill seeking desires (Franklin, 1998(Franklin, , 2000, and reduce anxiety elicited by psychological conflicts associated with gender and sexuality (Franklin, 2000, Herek, 1986. Although empirical research supports these general distinctions (Franklin, 2000), any given act of aggression toward gay men or other sexual minorities is likely motivated by the convergence of multiple motives.Given this proliferation of theoretical explanations, empirical study of these motives is of the utmost theoretical and applied importance. In particular, emphasis on individual and situational determinants of aggression toward sexual minorities informs theory by elucidating specific variables that cause individual attacks. In turn, this information may guide risk assessment and intervention targeted toward the individual. To this end, Parrott (2008) reviewed individual and situational risk factors and mediating pathways for aggression toward sexual minorities Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Dominic J. Parrott, Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 5010, Atlanta, Georgia 30302-5010. E-mail: parrott@gsu.edu.
NIH Public AccessAuthor Manuscript J Pers. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 August 1.
NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript that are associated with these motivations. This conceptualization represents an application of the General Aggression Model, which is a parsimonious theory ...