Editorial CommentCatheter ablation targeting the pulmonary veins or left atrial substrate, or both, has become an established strategy for the management of patients with drug refractory, symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF). The number of AF ablation procedures has doubled in the past 4 years; in 2008, an estimated 80,000 AF ablation procedures were performed in the United States alone. Despite the increasing number of patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF, fundamental questions remain regarding procedural efficacy and safety.Atrioesophageal (AE) fistula is a rare but dreaded and devastating complication of catheter ablation for AF. Although the reported incidence is only about 0.03-0.2%, the resultant mortality is in excess of 75%. 1-3 Since the initial reports of this complication, an intense effort has been undertaken to understand the pathophysiology underlying this condition and to develop means to prevent this complication. What is now apparent is that the A-E fistula is just the "tip of the iceberg." 4 Milder forms of esophageal injury that range from esophageal erythema to intramural hemorrhage to frank esophageal ulcers can occur in a significant number of patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. 5-8 With the addition of sophisticated imaging technologies such as radial endosonography, endoscopy can demonstrate morphological changes in the periesophageal connective tissue and the posterior wall of the left atrium (LA), even in the absence of gross changes in the esophageal mucosa. 4 Importantly, animal models suggest that these esophageal lesions are a form of thermal injury in that there is a linear relationship between the measured esophageal temperature and the frequency with which esophageal (and periesophageal) injury occurs as well as the size of individual lesions. 9,10 Over the past several years, investigators have reported on the merits of various intraprocedural interventions aimed at reducing the likelihood of inadvertent esophageal injury and thus an A-E fistula. These include some basic measures like reduction of energy when targeting the posterior LA wall or avoidance of lesions in this region and also techniques for real-time intraprocedural visualization of the esophagus, 11,12 monitoring of ablation lesions using intracardiac echocar-