2022
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What are common barriers and helpful solutions to colorectal cancer screening? A cross-sectional survey to develop intervention content for a planning support tool

Abstract: ObjectiveColorectal screening using faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) can save lives if the people invited participate. In Scotland, most people intend to complete a FIT but this is not reflected in uptake rates. Planning interventions can bridge this intention-behaviour gap. To develop a tool supporting people willing to do colorectal screening with planning to complete a FIT, this study aimed to identify frequently experienced barriers and solutions to these barriers.DesignThis is a cross-sectional study.Se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The biggest limitation with FE-1 testing is that samples may not be returned. In bowel cancer screening programs, failure to return samples was often attributed to forgetting about the kit or hygiene concerns [31,32]. More than 80% of the stool samples were returned in those with PDAC and HVs in this study, but most of these samples were made available during the 240 min in which test was conducted, and this was clearly explained on the participant information sheet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The biggest limitation with FE-1 testing is that samples may not be returned. In bowel cancer screening programs, failure to return samples was often attributed to forgetting about the kit or hygiene concerns [31,32]. More than 80% of the stool samples were returned in those with PDAC and HVs in this study, but most of these samples were made available during the 240 min in which test was conducted, and this was clearly explained on the participant information sheet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…While the planning tool instructions encourage people to use the planning tool, they do not suggest that participants must do so in order to take part in CRC screening. The specific listed concerns and tips are based on extensive development work involving consideration of existing theoretical and empirical literature, in-depth qualitative interviews, a survey of people who had been invited to complete a FIT and codesign workshops to create a user-friendly planning tool with members of the public who have completed the FIT and others who have not completed the FIT 31–33. The final planning tool was reviewed and approved by the Research Team, Patient and Public Involvement representatives (PPRs), and a patient and public group of the Scottish Primary Care Network.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim is to obtain responses from approximately 1000 cases and 1000 controls across the eight groups. Based on previous work, we anticipate achieving a higher response rate from those returning the FIT and a lower response from those not returning the FIT, therefore approximately 11 872 questionnaires will be mailed, as shown in figure 1 32. A reminder questionnaire will be sent to those who have not returned the questionnaire after 3 weeks.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Scotland, 2387 participants identified procrastination and anxiety about possible cancer as limiting factors for undergoing FIT. 35 colonoscopies were associated with a significant reduction in CRC incidence by 69% and mortality by 68%. 22 This shows the successful story of how the United States decreased CRC by implementing this screening protocol.…”
Section: Screening According To Current Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%