What are judgment skills in health literacy? A psycho-cognitive perspective of judgment and decision-making research

Abstract

ObjectiveThe aim of this review is to summarize current research relating to psychological processes involved in judgment and decision-making (JDM) and identify which processes can be incorporated and used in the construct of health literacy (HL) in order to enrich its conceptualization and to provide more information about people’s preferences.MethodsThe literature review was aimed at identifying comprehensive research in the field; therefore appropriate databases were searched for English language articles dated from 1998 to 2015.ResultsSeveral psychological processes have been found to be constituents of JDM and potentially incorporated in the definition of HL: cognition, self-regulation, emotion, reasoning-thinking, and social perception.ConclusionHL research can benefit from this JDM literature overview, first, by elaborating on the idea that judgment is multidimensional and constituted by several specific processes, and second, by using the results to implement the definition of “judgment skills”. Moreover, this review can favor the development of new instruments that can measure HL.Practical implicationsFuture researchers in HL should work together with researchers in psychological sciences not only to investigate the processes behind JDM in-depth but also to create effective opportunities to improve HL in all patients, to promote good decisions, and orient patients’ preferences in all health contexts.

The role of autobiographical story-telling during rehabilitation among hip-fracture geriatric patients

“…Narrative medicine offers a model for improving communication between patients and physicians, which in turn affects the patient’s well-being as well as the quality of care and health outcomes (Charon, 2008; Riva et al, 2014; Riva, Iannello, Antonietti, & Pravettoni, 2015). It allows a clinician to listen to the patient’ story; his or her fears, suffering, and hopes; and his/her description of how illness and medical care have affected his/her life.…”

Digital health interventions to help living with cancer: A systematic review of participants' engagement and psychosocial effects

“…They therefore need a degree of autonomy in managing disease symptoms and side effects due to disease and treatment. To achieve this, patients require skills and knowledge about how to find and use information regarding their health situation . This greater autonomy may lead to a faster return to daily activity and work and therefore greater psychological wellbeing.…”

Effects of an interactive mHealth innovation for early detection of patient-reported symptom distress with focus on participatory care: protocol for a study based on prospective, randomised, controlled trials in patients with prostate and breast cancer

“…Symptoms of cancer and side effects of treatment vary [ 14 ]; consequently, care and support should be based on the needs of the individual patient [ 7 – 9 , 15 ]. Most patients in treatment remain living at home and this generally involves a degree of self-sufficiency in managing symptoms and side effects (self-care) including skills and knowledge concerning how to find and use information in regards to one’s health [ 16 – 18 ]. Currently, cancer patients may not receive adequate support to manage symptoms and side effects during treatment, resulting in a large number of patients visiting emergency departments, many of whom have to be hospitalised [ 19 – 23 ].…”