2001
DOI: 10.1002/gj.879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What are Lazarus taxa?

Abstract: The many de®nitions and interpretations associated with the`Lazarus effect' have considerably confused this notion. While several authors regard the Lazarus effect as the temporary disappearance of taxa from the fossil record in any given time interval, many others consider the Lazarus effect as a pattern restricted to mass extinction episodes. The adequacy of the fossil record is the key for interpreting the Lazarus pattern: either Lazarus taxa re¯ect the incompleteness of the fossil record (the`stratigraphic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Perhaps diverse faunas existed but are simply not represented as fossils, and the prolonged biotic recovery is actually more apparent than real? One clear indicator of a relatively poor quality fossil record is an increase in the number of Lazarus taxa (Benton 1987;Fara 2001). Flessa & Jablonski (1983) coined the term 'Lazarus effect' to describe the temporary disappearance of taxa from the fossil record during extinction intervals.…”
Section: The Oman Fauna and The Lazarus Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps diverse faunas existed but are simply not represented as fossils, and the prolonged biotic recovery is actually more apparent than real? One clear indicator of a relatively poor quality fossil record is an increase in the number of Lazarus taxa (Benton 1987;Fara 2001). Flessa & Jablonski (1983) coined the term 'Lazarus effect' to describe the temporary disappearance of taxa from the fossil record during extinction intervals.…”
Section: The Oman Fauna and The Lazarus Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…malevkensis (REITLINGER), the huge gap of roughly more than 100 my until the appearance of Thaumatoporella parvovesiculifera (PIA) in the Middle Triassic can also be taken as evidence that these are different taxa. Alternatively, our data are currently insufficient to provide a comprehensible explanation, whether we are dealing with a real reappearance of the same genus (Lazarus taxon or effect; JAB-LONSKI, 1986;WIGNALL & BENTON, 1999;FARA, 2001), a case of morphological convergence (e.g., ?functional convergence: psammobiontic Irregularina-type forms) of two different genera, or incompleteness of the fossil record perhaps in a period of generally low proliferation of thaumatoporellacens. In the latter case, thaumatoporellacenas might have survived the end-Permian mass-extinction (e.g., KNOLL et al, 2007;BOTTJER et al, 2008;SAHNEY & BENTON, 2008) and could then be considered as a longterm refugia species (e.g., HARRIES et al, 1996).…”
Section: Plate VIImentioning
confidence: 86%
“…That is their populations are small, with seemingly narrow distributional ranges that have been so for considerable periods of time. The fossil record is so sporadic that they could be regarded as 'Lazarus taxa' (Jablonski 1986;Fara 2001), that is genera thought to have become extinct but reappear at more recent horizons. Although their survival is problematic, populations of the bivalves could have been tucked away in small refugia with low preservational potential or less likelihood of subsequent discovery.…”
Section: Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%