2008
DOI: 10.1353/dsp.2008.0020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Are “Reverse Diasporas” and How Are We to Understand Them?

Abstract: This article presents empirical evidence from two contemporary diasporas to support the thesis that formal return to the homeland does not necessarily “unmake” diasporas, as some scholars have previously suggested. I argue that, instead, so-called reverse diaspora formation processes take place, with important repercussions for the acculturation of co-ethnic immigrants in their nominal “homelands.” This article focuses on this latter issue, primarily on processes of identity formation and notions of belonging … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ambivalence towards the homeland is a common experience for members of minority groups (King & Christou, 2010). For instance, Hess (2008) describes the experience of Greek and German people who face social exclusion, expropriation, disenfranchisement, and stigmatization while living as minorities in the Soviet Union. After returning to their countries of origin, they engaged in reversed diaspora practices through diasporic Soviet activities).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ambivalence towards the homeland is a common experience for members of minority groups (King & Christou, 2010). For instance, Hess (2008) describes the experience of Greek and German people who face social exclusion, expropriation, disenfranchisement, and stigmatization while living as minorities in the Soviet Union. After returning to their countries of origin, they engaged in reversed diaspora practices through diasporic Soviet activities).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The USSR allowed resident ethnic Greeks, ethnic Germans and Jewish people to emigrate to Greece, Germany and Israel, respectively (through special resettlement programs set up by the receiving countries), because these groups experienced forced displacement and persecution in the USSR before, during and after the Second World War (Dietz, 2000; Ohliger and Münz, 2002; Remennick, 2009). These unique types of emigration flow from the USSR have been identified in the migration literature as ‘diasporic “homecomings”’ (Hess, 2008: 288), as migrations of ‘ethnic unmixing’ or ‘ethnic affinity’ (Brubaker, 1998: 1047), or as the ‘making and un-making’ of ethnic diasporas (Ohliger and Münz, 2002: 45). A common feature among these ethnic migrations was that migrants at their destination were legally privileged, since upon arrival in their ‘ancestral homelands,’ they were immediately awarded citizenship and granted all rights and benefits of the native population.…”
Section: Russian Immigration To New Zealand: History and Key Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 For in-depth discussion and analysis of ‘ethnic’ migrations from the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and Russia: about ethnic Germans – see Brubaker (1998), Dietz (2000, 2003), Hess (2008), and Ohliger and Münz (2002); about ethnic Greeks – see Hess (2008); and about Jewish emigration – see Dietz (2000), Remennick (2009), Tolts (2003) and Trier (1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mere fact that they return to the homeland is not sufficient to "unmake" the diaspora experience, identity, and mélange of culture, asserts Hess (2008). The author compares and contrasts the diasporas of 200,000 Greeks and 2.2 million Germans who repatriated to Greece and Germany respectively after perestroika from the former USSR.…”
Section: The Case Of Reverse Diasporamentioning
confidence: 99%