What are the essential features of a successful surgical registry? a systematic review

Abstract

ObjectiveThe regulation of surgical implants is vital to patient safety, and there is an international drive to establish registries for all implants. Hearing loss is an area of unmet need, and industry is targeting this field with a growing range of surgically implanted hearing devices. Currently, there is no comprehensive UK registry capturing data on these devices; in its absence, it is difficult to monitor safety, practices and effectiveness. A solution is developing a national registry of all auditory implants. However, developing and maintaining a registry faces considerable challenges. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify the essential features of a successful surgical registry.MethodsA systematic literature review was performed adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis recommendations. A comprehensive search of the Medline and Embase databases was conducted in November 2016 using the Ovid Portal. Inclusion criteria were: publications describing the design, development, critical analysis or current status of a national surgical registry. All registry names identified in the screening process were noted and searched in the grey literature. Available national registry reports were reviewed from registry websites. Data were extracted using a data extraction table developed by thematic analysis. Extracted data were synthesised into a structured narrative.ResultsSixty-nine publications were included. The fundamentals to successful registry development include: steering committee to lead and oversee the registry; clear registry objectives; planning for initial and long-term funding; strategic national collaborations among key stakeholders; dedicated registry management team; consensus meetings to agree registry dataset; established data processing systems; anticipating challenges; and implementing strategies to increase data completion. Patient involvement and awareness of legal factors should occur throughout the development process.ConclusionsThis systematic review provides robust knowledge that can be used to inform the successful development of any UK surgical registry. It also provides a methodological framework for international surgical registry development.

Total endoscopic stapes surgery: Systematic review and pooled analysis of audiological outcomes

“…Successful surgical registries have been found to provide essential clinical and cost‐effectiveness evidence as well as promote patient choice, trust, and transparency. It has also been recognized that registry data can serve as a valuable alternative to randomized trials …”

Experience gained from the implementation of the Saudi TraumA Registry (STAR)

“…The literature [19] identifies several features of successful registries including but not limited to organisational support; existence of a steering committee; viable funding options; surety of purpose; committed registry management; training of registry staff; attention to data quality; organised data collection; secure data storage system and flexible reporting options. However, to the best of our knowledge the literature has not described any other step-by-step guide used in the establishment of other trauma registries and indeed O'Reilly et al [20] cited a perception among their study participants that no such guide was available.…”

Guidelines on the surgical management of sleep disorders: A systematic review

“…It has also been recognized that registry data can serve as a valuable alternative to randomized trials . Owing to the challenges of registry development, research has been conducted to facilitate this process …”

“…[34][35][36] Owing to the challenges of registry development, research has been conducted to facilitate this process. [37][38][39]…”