2017
DOI: 10.1155/2017/1595406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Are the Factors Influencing Implementation of Advanced Access in Family Medicine Units? A Cross-Case Comparison of Four Early Adopters in Quebec

Abstract: Introduction Advanced access is an organizational model that has shown promise in improving timely access to primary care. In Quebec, it has recently been introduced in several family medicine units (FMUs) with a teaching mission. The objectives of this paper are to analyze the principles of advanced access implemented in FMUs and to identify which factors influenced their implementation. Methods A multiple case study of four purposefully selected FMUs was conducted. Data included document analysis and 40 semi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
23
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
23
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In Canada, leadership strategy and availability of human resources are found to be crucial to implementation success or failure, and, by providing training and education to all team members and patients throughout the process, these barriers seemed to be possible to overcome. During implementation, the issue of integration of nurses has been overlooked; however, expending the nurse role appeared to be the way for addressing the problem of accessibility, continuation of care, and physician's workload, which is in accordance with the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In Canada, leadership strategy and availability of human resources are found to be crucial to implementation success or failure, and, by providing training and education to all team members and patients throughout the process, these barriers seemed to be possible to overcome. During implementation, the issue of integration of nurses has been overlooked; however, expending the nurse role appeared to be the way for addressing the problem of accessibility, continuation of care, and physician's workload, which is in accordance with the current study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The perceived challenges are numerous and concern choosing and organizing the residents’ patient population, balancing accessibility and relational continuity of care, managing and balancing residents’ appointment schedules, understanding and appropriating the model, and establishing collaborative practice. They are also influenced by organizational challenges (e.g., lack of financial or professional resources, or leadership), as reported in a separate article [21] and in other research studies conducted abroad [1,22] that should not be overlooked.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past 4 years, the majority of family physicians, in close partnership with other professionals working in primary care settings, have implemented advanced access in their organization. We conducted the first two studies (2014, 2016) to understand the early experiences of implementing advanced access with the first adopters family physicians [7], as well as with the first university family medicine groups (UFMGs) who implemented it in Quebec [22]. Results showed not only a wide variation in its implementation levels, but also different combinations of its key guiding principles, among medical practices, as well as among professionals working within the same settings.…”
Section: Study Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the professionals themselves could provide verbal information on the research project to patients during their visits. These techniques have already been used in our previous project [7,22] on advanced access and were successful in recruiting and conducting three focus groups in a single UFMG. The patient partners on our advisory team will be involved in the data collection and results interpretation.…”
Section: A) Qualitative Component Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%