2024
DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkae058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What are the optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets for β-lactamase inhibitors? A systematic review

Getnet M Assefa,
Jason A Roberts,
Solomon A Mohammed
et al.

Abstract: Background Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices are widely used for the selection of optimum antibiotic doses. For β-lactam antibiotics, fT>MIC, best relates antibiotic exposure to efficacy and is widely used to guide the dosing of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations, often without considering any PK/PD exposure requirements for BLIs. Objectives This systematic review aimed to describe the PK/P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 80 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is also the implication that the dose selection for approved β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations currently in clinical use may have been suboptimal. Independent support for this premise can be found in the recently published systematic review by Assefa et al [51]. The authors surveyed the nonclinical evidence that has been used to identify PK/PD indices and target values for approved β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, there is also the implication that the dose selection for approved β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations currently in clinical use may have been suboptimal. Independent support for this premise can be found in the recently published systematic review by Assefa et al [51]. The authors surveyed the nonclinical evidence that has been used to identify PK/PD indices and target values for approved β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%