2011
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.93b5.25520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What are the reliable radiological indicators of lumbar segmental instability?

Abstract: We examined the reliability of radiological findings in predicting segmental instability in 112 patients (56 men, 56 women) with a mean age of 66.5 years (27 to 84) who had degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. They underwent intra-operative biomechanical evaluation using a new measurement system. Biomechanical instability was defined as a segment with a neutral zone > 2 mm/N. Risk factor analysis to predict instability was performed on radiographs (range of segmental movement, disc height), MRI (Thompson … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
27
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We used absolute angles, indicating that we did not consider rotation in one direction as positive nor rotation in the opposite direction as negative. The FJ orientation was labeled as coronal if angles were > 45° and sagittal if angles were ≤ 45° [51]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used absolute angles, indicating that we did not consider rotation in one direction as positive nor rotation in the opposite direction as negative. The FJ orientation was labeled as coronal if angles were > 45° and sagittal if angles were ≤ 45° [51]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of dynamic intersegmental stability requires technologically demanding methods such as videofluoroscopy [14,15] and intraoperative biomechanical testing [16,17]; although they are reliable, these methods have been shown to have limited clinical applicability. Thus, to overcome this issue, researchers have focused on measuring entire spine motions, while applying external force [18], sudden load release [19,20], or postural perturbation [21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FJ orientation was calculated by averaging the angle between the right and left side of the FJs. The FJ orientation was labeled as coronal if angles were > 45°, sagittal if angles were ≤ 45° and anisotropic if one side was over and the other side under 45° [42].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%