2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.05.014
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What are the risk factors for dislocation in primary total hip arthroplasty? A multicenter case-control study of 128 unstable and 438 stable hips

Abstract: Level III; case-control study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
57
2
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
57
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11] More than half of dislocations occur in the first three months following primary THR. [12][13][14] As the population ages and with growing volumes of primary THR, it is estimated that there will be a proportionate rise in the number of complications and revisions, 15,16 including revision for dislocations. Dislocation can result in severe pain, restriction of mobility, recurrent dislocation, and poor quality of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11] More than half of dislocations occur in the first three months following primary THR. [12][13][14] As the population ages and with growing volumes of primary THR, it is estimated that there will be a proportionate rise in the number of complications and revisions, 15,16 including revision for dislocations. Dislocation can result in severe pain, restriction of mobility, recurrent dislocation, and poor quality of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…table 1; appendix pp[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].The 125 unique studies comprised of 116 (92.8%) observational designs and 9 (7.2%) RCTs.Publication dates of included studies ranged from 1975 to 2019. A summary of the key characteristics of eligible studies is presented in table 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors associated with higher dislocation rates post-THA are small head size; femoral component malpositioning; cup inclination outside Lewinnek`s safe zone (30°-50°); inappropriate anteversion; unrepaired joint capsule; lowvolume surgeon; and patient-specific factors such as neurological deficits (dementia, Parkinson disease), high ASA score, history of spinal fusion, abductor deficiency, body mass index > 35 kg/m 2 , and preoperative Harris Hip Score < 41 [5,[7][8][9][10][11]. Despite lower dislocation rates, BHA is associated with higher periprosthetic fracture rates most likely because of lower bone quality [1,3,4,8,[12][13][14]. Owing to higher patients' satisfaction with THA than HA in case of displaced femoral neck fractures, the former is recommended in patients aged < 80 years and with a life expectancy of > 4 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports on increased length of stay, non-routine discharge, perioperative morbidity, periprosthetic infection rate, risk of falling and perioperative bleeding are all causes for concern. Furthermore, psychiatric patient may have a potential risk of postoperative artificial joint dislocation [14]. Gylvin et al described that pre-existing psychological factors have an effect on the outcome of arthroplasty and appropriate strategies might be needed [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%