2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-020-03590-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What are the risk factors of failure of enhanced recovery after right colectomy? Results of a prospective study on 140 consecutive cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effectiveness of ERPs is now well established. Nevertheless, in recent years several authors have addressed the failure of enhanced recovery programmes in colorectal surgery [2][3][4][5][6]. In doing so they raise the question of what precisely is meant by failure of an ERP, as the criteria for failure vary markedly in the literature.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The effectiveness of ERPs is now well established. Nevertheless, in recent years several authors have addressed the failure of enhanced recovery programmes in colorectal surgery [2][3][4][5][6]. In doing so they raise the question of what precisely is meant by failure of an ERP, as the criteria for failure vary markedly in the literature.…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many recent studies, the main criterion of failure was postoperative length of stay (POLOS), which varied widely from more than 5 days [3,4] to more than 7-8 days. [2,5] Other criteria of failure were postoperative nausea/vomiting (PONV) precluding early oral feeding and/or postoperative ileus (POI) [5], or unplanned readmission, complications or death [3].…”
Section: Dear Editormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations