What Are We Assessing When We Measure Food Security? A Compendium and Review of Current Metrics

Abstract

The appropriate measurement of food security is critical for targeting food and economic aid; supporting early famine warning and global monitoring systems; evaluating nutrition, health, and development programs; and informing government policy across many sectors. This important work is complicated by the multiple approaches and tools for assessing food security. In response, we have prepared a compendium and review of food security assessment tools in which we review issues of terminology, measurement, and validation. We begin by describing the evolving definition of food security and use this discussion to frame a review of the current landscape of measurement tools available for assessing food security. We critically assess the purpose/s of these tools, the domains of food security assessed by each, the conceptualizations of food security that underpin each metric, as well as the approaches that have been used to validate these metrics. Specifically, we describe measurement tools that 1) provide national-level estimates of food security, 2) inform global monitoring and early warning systems, 3) assess household food access and acquisition, and 4) measure food consumption and utilization. After describing a number of outstanding measurement challenges that might be addressed in future research, we conclude by offering suggestions to guide the selection of appropriate food security metrics.

Insegurança alimentar entre adolescentes brasileiros: um estudo de validação da Escala Curta de Insegurança Alimentar

“…Com intuito de mensurar diretamente a insegurança alimentar, foi desenvolvido pelo United States Department of Agriculture (USDA, Departamento de Agricultura dos Estados Unidos) um questionário com 18 itens capaz de medir diretamente a insegurança alimentar e a fome 4 . No Brasil, a escala americana foi adaptada e validada, dando origem à Escala Brasileira de Medida de Insegurança Alimentar (EBIA), que classifica o domicílio em seguro ou inseguro em três níveis: leve, moderado e grave 5,6 .…”

An Evaluation of Climate Mitigation Adoption Technologies in Improving Rural Households‘ Livelihood Outcomes: The Case of Eastern Oromia, Ethiopia

“…Household surveys yield information about household expenditure decisions and take the actual demographic structure of the household into account (de Haen, 2011). They are also costly to implement and tend to be infrequently administered (Jones et al, 2013;de Haen, 2011). Perhaps recent research suggests household food consumption expenditure results can vary significantly based on survey design, with some authors arguing this should be only be used with great caution until more consistent and comparable survey data collection can be completed (de Weerdt et al, 2015;Carletto et al, 2012).…”

Training Future Actors in the Food System: A new collaborative cross-institutional, interdisciplinary training programme for students

“…There is no one-size-fits-all solution. Interventions must be tailored to local conditions, including the availability of, and access to, food, utilisation of food products based on cultural and dietary requirements, and provision of long-term stability (FAO 1996;Jones et al 2013). Thus, approaches to tackling food insecurity need to be appropriate and comprehensive, with the necessary political commitment to securing success.…”