2020
DOI: 10.1080/03623319.2020.1760074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Buddhist wisdom is going viral? A multimodal-appraisal analysis of a selection of Jay Shetty’s digital narratives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MCDA is concerned with the synergy of semiotic resources and sensory modalities for poly-semiotic communication to effectively take place. Several critical discourse analysis studies place significant emphasis on the multimodal legitimation of social practices in hybrid means of communication (See, for example, Elyamany 2020Elyamany , 2021Ledin and Machin 2019;Machin 2016;Machin, Caldas-Coulthard and Milani 2016;Machin and Mayr 2012;Zhao et al 2019).…”
Section: Preludementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCDA is concerned with the synergy of semiotic resources and sensory modalities for poly-semiotic communication to effectively take place. Several critical discourse analysis studies place significant emphasis on the multimodal legitimation of social practices in hybrid means of communication (See, for example, Elyamany 2020Elyamany , 2021Ledin and Machin 2019;Machin 2016;Machin, Caldas-Coulthard and Milani 2016;Machin and Mayr 2012;Zhao et al 2019).…”
Section: Preludementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCDA is concerned with the synergy of semiotic resources and sensory modalities for poly-semiotic communication to effectively take place. Several critical discourse analysis studies place significant emphasis on the multimodal legitimation of social practices in hybrid means of communication (See, for example, Elyamany, 2020, 2021; Ledin and Machin, 2019; Machin, 2016; Machin et al, 2016; Machin and Mayr, 2012; Zhao et al, 2019). Although MCDA unveils the ideological and social practices situated in the intersemiosis prevailing cinematic discourse (Bateman and Schmidt, 2013; Piazza et al, 2011), it barely directs attention to the indexicalities of posthuman identity construction from spatio-temporal and cognitive standpoints, nor does it employ systematic methodological toolboxes to address the semio-discursive signage permeating postcyberpunk films (Stamou, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%