1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17377.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Can Be Learned From Informal Student Writings in a Science Context?

Abstract: This exploratory study analyzed four informal science-related writing tasks produced by 374 seventhgrade students (172 boys and 202 girls) from t\vo schools with different socioeconomic populations. The study demonstrates that students3 informal writing in science contexts can provide a rich source of information regarding students' cognitive and attitudinal engagement with science. Students9 writing reflects the level atwhich students understand previously learned science-related ideas and gives insight into … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite these differences, writing by children and young adults has been found to display many of the genderlinked language effects evident in face-to-face conversation and e-mail (see Janssen & Murachver, 2004, for a review). For example, it is more typical for females than males to include politeness markers (Rubin & Greene, 1992), references to emotion (Levine & Geldman-Caspar, 1997;Mulac & Lundell, 1994;Mulac, Studley, & Blau, 1990), and true, personal experiences (Marschall, 1997;Peterson, 2001). Females tend to include more markers of excitability (e.g., exclamation marks and underlining; Colley & Todd, 2002;Hiatt, 1977;Rubin & Greene, 1992), hedges (Mulac et al, 1990), intensifiers, compliments (Janssen & Murachver, 2004), third-person pronouns (Colley & Todd, 2002;Janssen & Murachver, 2004), and use shorter sentences (Hiatt, 1977;Mulac et al, 1990;Rubin & Greene, 1992) than males in their writing.…”
Section: Gender Differences In Language Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these differences, writing by children and young adults has been found to display many of the genderlinked language effects evident in face-to-face conversation and e-mail (see Janssen & Murachver, 2004, for a review). For example, it is more typical for females than males to include politeness markers (Rubin & Greene, 1992), references to emotion (Levine & Geldman-Caspar, 1997;Mulac & Lundell, 1994;Mulac, Studley, & Blau, 1990), and true, personal experiences (Marschall, 1997;Peterson, 2001). Females tend to include more markers of excitability (e.g., exclamation marks and underlining; Colley & Todd, 2002;Hiatt, 1977;Rubin & Greene, 1992), hedges (Mulac et al, 1990), intensifiers, compliments (Janssen & Murachver, 2004), third-person pronouns (Colley & Todd, 2002;Janssen & Murachver, 2004), and use shorter sentences (Hiatt, 1977;Mulac et al, 1990;Rubin & Greene, 1992) than males in their writing.…”
Section: Gender Differences In Language Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When children are allowed to write informally, gender differences exist in the topics chosen, character gender, emotional and aggressive tones, and levels of organization (Levine & Geldman-Caspar, 1997;Marschall, 1997;S. Peterson, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peterson, 2001). Levine and Geldman-Caspar (1997) showed that when writing about science, girls focused more on others, included more references to emotion, and tended to integrate any facts they provided with overall meaning. Boys, however, tended to list facts without links, gave more technical information, and remained detached and formal.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%