2019
DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Can We Quantify About Carer Behavior?

Abstract: In many species, individuals must contribute extensively to offspring care to reproduce successfully. Within species, variation in care is driven by local social, physiological, and environmental contexts, and this relationship has been a major focus of behavioral ecology since the inception of the field. The majority of existing studies on care, both theoretical and empirical, have focused on measuring the amount of care delivered by each carer as a proxy for individual investment, linking this investment to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While we were unable to find a role for chick begging cues or parental reunion at the nest in the coordination of provisioning behaviour in the Manx shearwater, it is not clear whether this is because parents use alternative mechanisms to regulate their care, such as olfactory cues or reunion outside of the nest, or because they do not actively coordinate their provisioning behaviour at all. Though the coordination of parental behaviour is clearly widespread (Johnstone et al 2014, Bebbington and Hatchwell 2016, Mariette 2019, Savage and Hinde 2019), demonstrating conclusively that this is an active process is not straightforward. Similarities in individual behaviour may lead to synchrony in parental care if, for example, parents respond to environmental or physiological cues in the same way (Schlicht et al 2016, Savage et al 2017, Lejeune et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we were unable to find a role for chick begging cues or parental reunion at the nest in the coordination of provisioning behaviour in the Manx shearwater, it is not clear whether this is because parents use alternative mechanisms to regulate their care, such as olfactory cues or reunion outside of the nest, or because they do not actively coordinate their provisioning behaviour at all. Though the coordination of parental behaviour is clearly widespread (Johnstone et al 2014, Bebbington and Hatchwell 2016, Mariette 2019, Savage and Hinde 2019), demonstrating conclusively that this is an active process is not straightforward. Similarities in individual behaviour may lead to synchrony in parental care if, for example, parents respond to environmental or physiological cues in the same way (Schlicht et al 2016, Savage et al 2017, Lejeune et al 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, individuals could also increase their investment when paired with poorly ornamented mates (or in general poor quality mates) in order to improve on an unfortunate situation (reproductive compensation; Gowaty et al 2007;Gowaty 2008). Reproductive compensation might be more advantageous if the reduction of the mate's ornamentation occurs unexpectedly after fertilization, when the offspring genetic quality is not at stake (Morales et al 2012), or at late stages of offspring development, when most of the strenuous parental effort has already been performed and the extra-investment could be of short duration (Savage and Hinde 2019). The optimal parental care strategy might thus be context-dependent, and it may also be highly dependent on the behaviour of the signaller (Ratikainen and Kokko 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work on diverse animal families has found evidence that such favourable combinations of phenotypes do indeed exist between social partners within animal families (e.g., Zeh and Zeh 2000; Linksvayer, Fondrk, and Page Jr 2009; Hinde, Johnstone, and Kilner 2010). Evidence from bird species, for example, has identified the precise ways in which adults coordinate their provisioning activity at the nest (e.g., Savage and Hinde 2019; Griffith 2019). Some of this coordination is the result of flexible decision-making, through adherence to adaptive ‘negotiation rules’ which enable mothers and fathers to fine-tune their provisioning behaviours to one another (e.g., McNamara et al 1999; Savage and Hinde 2019; Smiseth 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%