2018
DOI: 10.1186/s40645-018-0186-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What causes subsidence following the 2011 eruption at Nabro (Eritrea)?

Abstract: A major goal in volcanology is to be able to constrain the physical properties of a volcanic system using surface observations. The behaviour of a volcanic system following an eruption can provide powerful constraints on these properties and can provide valuable information for understanding future hazard. We use spatially and temporally dense observations of surface deformation following the 12 June 2011 eruption of Nabro (Eritrea) to place constraints on the mechanics of its subsurface volcanic system. Nabro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed post-intrusion subsidence may be related to continued drainage of magma into the dike or cooling and contraction of the residual material left in the sill after feeding the dike. Alternative mechanisms, such as viscoelastic relaxation or magma degassing, could also play a role (24). Regardless of the cause, the coincidence between the location of the inferred sill and base of the modeled dike supports the conclusion that the dike was fed from the same shallow reservoir.…”
Section: Insar Data and Deformation Modelingmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The observed post-intrusion subsidence may be related to continued drainage of magma into the dike or cooling and contraction of the residual material left in the sill after feeding the dike. Alternative mechanisms, such as viscoelastic relaxation or magma degassing, could also play a role (24). Regardless of the cause, the coincidence between the location of the inferred sill and base of the modeled dike supports the conclusion that the dike was fed from the same shallow reservoir.…”
Section: Insar Data and Deformation Modelingmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Indeed, some preeruptive periods show long‐term changes in deformation, but only a short run‐up of seismic activity (e.g., Okmok, Grimsvotn, and Wolf). Deformation can be caused by a range of volcanic processes including magma movement, degassing and phase changes, and hydrothermal processes (e.g., Biggs et al, ; Ebmeier et al, ; Hamlyn et al, ; Pinel et al, ). Even if deformation can be confidently attributed to magma movement, this is not necessarily a sign of imminent eruption, and more detections of deformation have been made during unrest than can be clearly linked to periods of eruption (e.g., Biggs et al, ; Ebmeier et al, ; Jay et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This option is also available in LiCSBAS (Step 1-6 explained in Section 2.4.6), but the assumption that noise is uncorrelated in time is not always correct. If the tropospheric delay is correlated in time and/or the deformation is uncorrelated in time, the deformation time series may be poorly recovered [41][42][43]. Furthermore, temporal filtering does not improve the accuracy of the average velocities retrieved from the time series.…”
Section: Step 0-2: Convert Geotiff (And Downsample)mentioning
confidence: 99%