2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11300-013-0272-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Causes the Regional Disparity of FDI in Russia? A Spatial Analysis

Abstract: We analyse the determinants of the regional disparity in attracting FDI in Russia using additions to fixed capital investment by foreign firms as the measure of FDI. The spatial distribution of FDI is attributed to regional and/or trans-regional factors. Region specific characteristics such as wage, education level, transportation as well as gross regional product, which accounts for market size, in host and alternative regions are considered to analyze the spatial interaction between regions employing spatial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regions in the proximity of Europe become advantageous after 1998. Kayam et al (2013) analyze the determinants of the regional disparity in attracting FDI in Russia. The spatial distribution of FDI is investigated using regional and/or trans-regional factors.…”
Section: Fdi Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regions in the proximity of Europe become advantageous after 1998. Kayam et al (2013) analyze the determinants of the regional disparity in attracting FDI in Russia. The spatial distribution of FDI is investigated using regional and/or trans-regional factors.…”
Section: Fdi Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As predicted by Helpman (1984), the benefits are created by multinationals' desire to access cheaper factor inputs, including immobile natural resources ('vertical' FDI). Empirical papers on Russia often report the key role of natural resources in the location of FDI (see, for example, Kayam et al, 2013;Iwasaki and Suganuma, 2005;Campos and Kinoshita, 2003;Estrin and Bevan, 2003;Bradshaw, 2002). Empirical papers on Russia often report the key role of natural resources in the location of FDI (see, for example, Kayam et al, 2013;Iwasaki and Suganuma, 2005;Campos and Kinoshita, 2003;Estrin and Bevan, 2003;Bradshaw, 2002).…”
Section: Theory and Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies, which have investigated the forces attracting FDI to Russian regions (see, for example, Kayam et al, 2013;Iwasaki and Suganuma, 2005;Ledyaeva, 2009), are based on aggregate regional FDI inflows. Recent studies, which have investigated the forces attracting FDI to Russian regions (see, for example, Kayam et al, 2013;Iwasaki and Suganuma, 2005;Ledyaeva, 2009), are based on aggregate regional FDI inflows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of empirical papers reports positive effects associated with regional market size in Russia (see e.g. Brock, 1998;Broadman and Recanatini, 2001;Iwasaki and Suganuma, 2005;Ledyaeva and Linden, 2006;Kayam, Hisarciklilar, and Yabrukov, 2007;Ledyaeva, 2009). Conversely, Manaenkov (2000) reports that market size is irrelevant for the decision of FDI to enter into a region, finding that the gravitation model is not robust and that regional size heightens the attractiveness for FDI only if the sample includes Moscow.…”
Section: Market Size As a Determinant Of Fdi Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kayam, Hisarciklilar, and Yabrukov (2007) analyze additions to fixed capital investment by foreign firms as the measure of FDI and find that FDI in a region depends on spatial market size and natural resources. However, Ledyaeva (2009) reports that the link between resources and FDI in the regions is traceable only since the 1998 economic crisis.…”
Section: Proximity and Neighborhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%