What clinicians want: Findings from a psychotherapy practice research network survey.

Abstract

Practice research networks may be one way of advancing knowledge translation and exchange (KTE) in psychotherapy. In this study, we document this process by first asking clinicians what they want from psychotherapy research. Eighty-two psychotherapists in 10 focus groups identified and discussed psychotherapy research topics relevant to their practices. An analysis of these discussions led to the development of 41 survey items. In an online survey, 1,019 participants, mostly practicing clinicians, rated the importance to their clinical work of these 41 psychotherapy research topics. Ratings were reduced using a principal components analysis in which 9 psychotherapy research themes emerged, accounting for 60.66% of the variance. Two postsurvey focus groups of clinicians (N = 22) aided in interpreting the findings. The ranking of research themes from most to least important were-Therapeutic Relationship/Mechanisms of Change, Therapist Factors, Training and Professional Development, Client Factors, Barriers and Stigma, Technology and Adjunctive Interventions, Progress Monitoring, Matching Clients to Therapist or Therapy, and Treatment Manuals. Few differences were noted in rankings based on participant age or primary therapeutic orientation. Postsurvey focus group participants were not surprised by the top-rated items, as they were considered most proximal and relevant to therapists and their work with clients during therapy sessions. Lower ranked items may be perceived as externally imposed agendas on the therapist and therapy. We discuss practice research networks as a means of creating new collaborations consistent with KTE goals. Findings of this study can help to direct practitioner-researcher collaborations.

Effects of Therapist Positioning within Patient Preferred Live Music on Positive and Negative Affect, Pain, and Trust in the Therapist with Adults on a Cardiovascular Unit: A Three-Group Randomized Pilot Effectiveness Study

“…Researchers have found consistent positive associations between therapeutic alliance and therapeutic outcome (Horvarth & Bedi, 2002;Orlinsky, Ronneslad, & Willutzki, 2004). Regardless of the type of therapy or philosophical orientation, therapists have been interested in therapeutic alliance as a vital element of therapeutic outcome (Tasca et al, 2015).…”

Co-creating fit: How staff work together to adapt and implement clinically relevant measures in child and youth mental health agencies

“…Philosophical barriers identified in the literature are typically related to staff perceiving the measures as unimportant, unhelpful, or even antithetical to their values. For example, a survey on the research interests of Canadian clinical psychologists suggested that clinicians had little interest in using outcome monitoring tools or related research to enhance their psychotherapy practice (Tasca et al, 2015). The authors suggest that clinicians may perceive outcome monitoring as an "externally imposed agenda" as opposed to a practice that can enhance clients' treatment outcomes (p. 9; Tasca et al, 2015).…”

“She was on my side, and grounded me when I needed it:” Research supervision in the field of therapy, based on counsellors’ and psychotherapists’ views on their engagement with research

“…Goldfried and Wolfe () described the relationship as a “strained alliance”. Tasca () refers to a “practice–research divide, which is widely acknowledged as a problem in psychotherapy” and Henton () has suggested that psychotherapy and research are often characterised as “opposing domains”. An almost dichotomous relationship between psychotherapy practice and research is also identified by Darlington and Scott ().…”