2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What colour should I wear? How clothing colour affects women's judgement of other women's body attractiveness and body size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Initial reports that red enhanced attractiveness (e.g. Elliot & Niesta, 2008 ; Roberts et al, 2010 ) have been discredited ( Francis, 2013 ; Hesslinger et al, 2015 ; Peperkoorn et al, 2016 ; though see Sidhu et al, 2021 ). It may not be that one size or colour fits all.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initial reports that red enhanced attractiveness (e.g. Elliot & Niesta, 2008 ; Roberts et al, 2010 ) have been discredited ( Francis, 2013 ; Hesslinger et al, 2015 ; Peperkoorn et al, 2016 ; though see Sidhu et al, 2021 ). It may not be that one size or colour fits all.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, although body attractiveness and body size judgements could be interdependent when manipulating bodily cues (e.g., slender bodies are often rated as more attractive with slimmer body size when manipulating dress style and colour; Cundall & Guo, 2017 ; Sidhu et al, 2021 ), in this study these two aspects of body perception were largely independent when manipulating facial cues. Different facial expressions and mask-on/mask-off on the same avatar could induce different body attractiveness ratings, but similar body size ratings (at least for avatars in sizes 8 and 16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…High-resolution female body images of computer-generated young adult Caucasian avatars wearing a tight dress in full frontal view were created via www.trymetail.com ( Sidhu et al, 2021 ). These bodies represented three common UK dress sizes (sizes 8, 12, and 16; standardized 165 cm height and 74 cm inner leg measurements; AA to C breast cup sizes increasing proportionally in parallel to dress sizes).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The suitability of this sample size was confirmed by power analysis using G * power software. With a conservative effect size of 0.3 often reported in previous studies on body attractiveness judgment and body-viewing gaze distribution (e.g., Cundall & Guo, 2017;Rodway et al, 2019;Sidhu et al, 2021), a sample of 21 and 28 participants in this study would have been large enough for the facial expression effect to be detected with a power of 0.95 at alpha level 0.05 and 1 nonsphericity correction in a 7 (facial expression) × 7 (body size) and 7 (facial expression) × 5 (body region) repeated measures design, respectively. All participants were either born in the UK or had spent considerable amount of time (> 1 year) studying in the UK, reported heterosexual orientation and no history of eating disorders, and had normal or corrected-to-normal visual acuity.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%