2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-019-05518-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Comes First: Treatment of Viral Hepatitis or Liver Cancer?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[74][75][76] It was later determined that patients who received DAA tended to be older and had more advanced disease or comorbidities compared to the untreated or IF-treated individuals in the comparison groups. 77 The adjusted estimates in our study reduced these biases and showed that DAAs are not associated with increased hazard of HCC recurrence (aHR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.42-1.15), and in fact may reduce the hazard of HCC occurrence (aHR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.54-0.84). Similarly, to account for patient differences, Waziry et al conducted a meta-regression and showed no evidence for an increased risk of HCC occurrence or recurrence following SVR after treatment with DAAs vs IF-based regimens (RR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.16-2.77 for de novo HCC, and RR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.11-3.45 for HCC recurrence).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…[74][75][76] It was later determined that patients who received DAA tended to be older and had more advanced disease or comorbidities compared to the untreated or IF-treated individuals in the comparison groups. 77 The adjusted estimates in our study reduced these biases and showed that DAAs are not associated with increased hazard of HCC recurrence (aHR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.42-1.15), and in fact may reduce the hazard of HCC occurrence (aHR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.54-0.84). Similarly, to account for patient differences, Waziry et al conducted a meta-regression and showed no evidence for an increased risk of HCC occurrence or recurrence following SVR after treatment with DAAs vs IF-based regimens (RR = 0.67; 95% CI: 0.16-2.77 for de novo HCC, and RR = 0.62; 95% CI: 0.11-3.45 for HCC recurrence).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Finally, we demonstrated that c-MYC is involved in the mechanism underlying HBx-induced URI1 expression, and that the E-box in the URI1 promoter is a biding site for c-MYC in HCC-B (Figure 4C). Although current clinical guidelines prioritize the treatment of HCC, it is also suggested that patients with HCC-B should undergo antivirus therapy prior to HCC treatment to reduce the risks of further liver injury, HBV reactivation, and HCC recurrence [19]. Therefore, the appropriate management of chronic HBV infection in HCC is attracting attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IκBα is considered to be a tumor-suppressing factor in different types of cancer, such as breast (23,24), ovarian (25), gastric (26) and colorectal (27), mainly due to its inhibition of NF-κB activity; however, the underlying mechanism is yet to be elucidated. Liver tumorigenesis is usually attributed to inflammation (28). Cell proliferation increases during inflammation, in which accelerated DNA replication results in the increased occurrence of oncogenic mutation (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%