2021
DOI: 10.1111/sed.12856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What controls the remobilization and deformation of surficial sediment by seismic shaking? Linking lacustrine slope stratigraphy to great earthquakes in South–Central Chile

Abstract: Remobilization and deformation of surficial subaqueous slope sediments create turbidites and soft sediment deformation structures, which are common features in many depositional records. Palaeoseismic studies have used seismically-induced turbidites and soft sediment deformation structures preserved in sedimentary sequences to reconstruct recurrence patterns andin some casesallow quantifying rupture location and magnitude of past earthquakes. However, current understanding of earthquake-triggered remobilizatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(231 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During 35–15 ka, 66% of the events are Type II deposits which are comparable in composition to aragonite‐detritus laminae (Figure 2), with thickness mostly <5 cm (Table ), and unrelated to other typical preconditioning factor(s) for subaqueous landslides such as enhanced sedimentation rate (Figure 3). Surficial sediment remobilization triggered by earthquakes that is, reported from Chilean lakes and offshore Japan may explain these new observations of very thin layers of mixed sediments from the Dead Sea (McHugh et al., 2016; Moernaut et al., 2017; Molenaar et al., 2021). These factors connected to lake‐level change can collectively favor the observed pattern of seismogenic mass failures in the Dead Sea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…During 35–15 ka, 66% of the events are Type II deposits which are comparable in composition to aragonite‐detritus laminae (Figure 2), with thickness mostly <5 cm (Table ), and unrelated to other typical preconditioning factor(s) for subaqueous landslides such as enhanced sedimentation rate (Figure 3). Surficial sediment remobilization triggered by earthquakes that is, reported from Chilean lakes and offshore Japan may explain these new observations of very thin layers of mixed sediments from the Dead Sea (McHugh et al., 2016; Moernaut et al., 2017; Molenaar et al., 2021). These factors connected to lake‐level change can collectively favor the observed pattern of seismogenic mass failures in the Dead Sea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Rossetti and Goes, 2000;Basilone et al, 2016, p.320;Kumar et al, 2021), with erosion above slump folds indicating that folding took place at the surface prior to deposition, and 'blanketing' by overlying beds (Ortner and Kilian, 2016, p.357). Surficial deformation and remobilisation of sediment occurred at depths of up to 20 cm from the sediment surface in Chilean lakes, with this depth increasing with greater slope angles and larger magnitude earthquakes (Molenaar et al, 2021). The stratigraphic record preserved by seismoturbidites in basinal sediments is crucial to recognise earthquake-induced surficial deformation of sediments in slope settings (Molenaar et al, 2021).…”
Section: Evidence For Surficial Deformation and The Sequential Failur...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surficial deformation and remobilisation of sediment occurred at depths of up to 20 cm from the sediment surface in Chilean lakes, with this depth increasing with greater slope angles and larger magnitude earthquakes (Molenaar et al, 2021). The stratigraphic record preserved by seismoturbidites in basinal sediments is crucial to recognise earthquake-induced surficial deformation of sediments in slope settings (Molenaar et al, 2021).…”
Section: Evidence For Surficial Deformation and The Sequential Failur...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the inferred earthquake events are relatively scaled above the lake's individual intensity threshold based on their imprint size. For Piburgersee, SSDS are scaled based on three development stages ranging from folded layer, incipient breccia to intraclast breccia with increasing intensity (Molenaar et al, 2021;Oswald et al, 2021b;Wetzler et al, 2010) including the deposit thickness and a normalization to the range 0 to 1. The largest imprint in each record corresponds to a value of 1.…”
Section: Extension Of the Paleoseismic Records And Event-scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%