2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2013.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What determines cash holdings at privately held and publicly traded firms? Evidence from 20 emerging markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gao et al (2013) shows that despite facing higher financial constraints, private firms hold about half as much cash as public firms and they attribute the difference to the relatively higher agency problems in the latter group of firms. Similar inferences on the importance of financial constraints in cash policies of private firms are presented by Bigelli and Sanchez-Vidal (2012) in Italy and in an international context by Hall et al (2014). Opler et al (1999) assume that firms face a trade-off between the costs associated with foregone investment opportunities due to lack of capital market access and the costs associated with the liquidity premium of holding cash or cash 6 Kling et al (2014) extend the analysis of Ozkan and Ozkan (2004) on UK-listed firms to include potential alternatives to cash, including trade credit and short-term debt.…”
Section: Determinants Of Firms' Demand For Cashsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Gao et al (2013) shows that despite facing higher financial constraints, private firms hold about half as much cash as public firms and they attribute the difference to the relatively higher agency problems in the latter group of firms. Similar inferences on the importance of financial constraints in cash policies of private firms are presented by Bigelli and Sanchez-Vidal (2012) in Italy and in an international context by Hall et al (2014). Opler et al (1999) assume that firms face a trade-off between the costs associated with foregone investment opportunities due to lack of capital market access and the costs associated with the liquidity premium of holding cash or cash 6 Kling et al (2014) extend the analysis of Ozkan and Ozkan (2004) on UK-listed firms to include potential alternatives to cash, including trade credit and short-term debt.…”
Section: Determinants Of Firms' Demand For Cashsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…A research study conducted by Hall, Mateus and Mateus (2014), which also included a sample of companies from the Republic of Serbia, has analysed the differences in the levels of cash holdings between public and private companies, as well as differences in the levels of cash holdings between companies operating in developed markets and those operating in developing markets. This study has provided evidence on the determinants of cash holdings for companies from different sectors, expanding the knowledge about cash holdings among companies in the Republic of Serbia.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have discovered a wide variety of variables with a considerable influence on cash holdings. Company-specific factors with a significant effect on the cash level include, among others, a short-term debt to the total of assets ratio, short-term liabilities to assets, return on assets, firm size, working capital to assets ratio (Hall et al, 2014), market value to book value and R&D/Sales (Wasiuzzaman, 2014), risk (cash flow volatility), and effective tax rate (Bigelli & Sanchez-Vidal, 2012).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subramaniam et al (2011) concluded that diversified companies hold significantly less cash than their focused counterparts, which they explained by the availability of the internal capital market. Hall et al (2014) showed that in Central and Eastern Europe, companies in more marketoriented economies (based on EBRD transition indicators) held more cash than those in other countries. They also found that privately owned firms tend to carry more money than public ones.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%