2020
DOI: 10.1111/coa.13691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What determines quality of life in patients with vestibular schwannoma?

Abstract: Objectives Patients with a vestibular schwannoma (VS) experience a reduced quality of life (QoL). The main objective of this study was to determine the strongest predictors reducing physical and mental QoL from the disease‐specific Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality of Life (PANQOL) questionnaire in patients with VS. Design Observational study. Setting Radboudumc Skull Base Centre, Nijmegen. Participants Patients newly diagnosed with VS between 2014 and 2017 managed with either observation, stereotactic radiosurger… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
6
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other disease states, dizziness is associated with quality of life and neurocognitive effects. For patients with acoustic neuroma, dizziness was the strongest predictor of quality of life and physical and mental health (12)(13)(14). For bilateral vestibulopathy, dizziness had a significant impact on physical and social functioning and overall quality of life (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other disease states, dizziness is associated with quality of life and neurocognitive effects. For patients with acoustic neuroma, dizziness was the strongest predictor of quality of life and physical and mental health (12)(13)(14). For bilateral vestibulopathy, dizziness had a significant impact on physical and social functioning and overall quality of life (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current goals of modern treatment include both maintaining long-term tumor control and maximizing FN function and QoL. FN dysfunction after surgery, in fact, has a significant impact on patients’ QoL and more emphasis is now being placed on preserving FN function at the cost of leaving residual tumors behind [ 8 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with a “normal population,” as well as with VS patients that are conservatively managed, the QoL of surgically treated patients has been reported to be poorer [ 1 , 2 , 16 , 17 ]. Selection bias has been reported since patients that undergo a watch-and-wait protocol usually present with smaller tumors and better hearing compared to those undergoing surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While hearing and balance also represent the most affected domains in other series of surgically treated patients [ 12 , 13 , 16 ], general health was reported to be significantly impaired only by Pruijn et al [ 16 ]. Such non-homogeneous results have been attributed to the fact that only two questions explore the general health domain in the PANQOL questionnaire and lead to a poor internal consistency of this scale [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%