What determines the development of a rural collective economy? A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) approach

Abstract

PurposeThis study explores configurations that promote the development of collective economies in China's rural villages and reveals the multiple development pathways that otherwise remain relatively unexamined in the literature.Design/methodology/approachThe authors obtained first-hand representative case data from 20 villages in 12 counties in 5 provinces in East, West and Central China via fieldwork and applied fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to conduct a configurational comparative study of the development of village collective economies.FindingsThis paper identifies five factors in the current literature that affect the development of village collectives, based on an “entrepreneur–situation” analytical framework. Using the fsQCA method, this study further obtains two main configurations of conditions that culminate in the growth of rural collective economies in China. The first solution is the “top-down path”: When entrepreneurial leadership (EL), resource endowment (RE) and government assistance (GA) are present, a village collective economy will experience a high level of development, irrespective of policy support (PS) and villagers' participation (VP). The second solution is the “bottom-up path”: When EL, VP and PS are present and GA is not present, a village collective economy will experience a high level of development, irrespective of RE. In both situations, EL stands out as the core condition for the development of village collective economies, implying the need for the government to vigorously cultivate the entrepreneurial skills and aspirations of village cadres.Originality/valueTaking a configurational perspective and using an fsQCA approach, this research constructs an “entrepreneur–situation” analytical framework to investigate the key combinations of factors and pathways involved in the high level of development of Chinese village collective economies.

Measurements and Influencing Factors of New Rural Collective Economies’ Resilience toward Mountain Disasters in Indigent Areas: A Case Study of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture, China

“…It aligns with the current mainstream rural development theory used in developed European countries [52]. This study incorporates both existing research findings and current realities [53][54][55]. The stable development of the rural collective economy requires a combination of internal and external resources, including (1) human resources, (2) financial resources, (3) institutional supply, (4) technical conditions, and (5) natural resources.…”

Exploring configurations of social determinants for enhancing older adult health in China: an fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis based on 31 provinces in China

“…Social Development Level: This factor mainly encompasses the degree of attracting immigrants and the level of aging ( 43 ). Hence, the economic development level is calculated by weighing two relative indicators: net migration rate (50%) and older adult dependency ratio (50%).…”

Effects of rural collective economy policy on the common prosperity in China: based on the mediating effect of farmland transfer

“…The progress of China's rural collective economy can be divided into three stages (Deng et al, 2023), as shown in Figure 1. Prior to the reform and opening up, China's rural areas had established a traditional collective organization based on the communalization, which experienced a phase of rapid development (Hong et al, 2023). Following the Third Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee in 1978, the rural reform resulted in the collapse of the people's commune and the gradual establishment of the family contract responsibility system, which put the enhancement of the collective economy in a dormant state (Zhang et al, 2019).…”