2019
DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2019.1582075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What difference does school leadership make to student outcomes?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
14

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
66
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Although each of the initial challenges faced in class swapping receded as phase 1A progressed, in phase 1B the organisational structure of class swapping was also altered to explicitly enhance teacher interaction. Research suggests it is important that leadership focuses teacher relationships and interaction on specific pedagogical work (Robinson et al, 2009). Through the introduction of planning and collaborative reflection documents with pedagogical prompts, the lead and participating teachers were supported to increase their interactions, as well as to focus these interactions on issues of a pedagogical nature.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although each of the initial challenges faced in class swapping receded as phase 1A progressed, in phase 1B the organisational structure of class swapping was also altered to explicitly enhance teacher interaction. Research suggests it is important that leadership focuses teacher relationships and interaction on specific pedagogical work (Robinson et al, 2009). Through the introduction of planning and collaborative reflection documents with pedagogical prompts, the lead and participating teachers were supported to increase their interactions, as well as to focus these interactions on issues of a pedagogical nature.…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Det har dog vist sig vanskeligt at udforske de relevante variable, der udgør linket mellem paedagogisk ledelse og effekten på elevernes laering (Robinson & Gray, 2019).…”
Section: Paedagogisk Ledelseunclassified
“…Robinson & Gray peger derfor på, at man fremfor at undersøge, om og hvor mange observationer lederen foretager, bør foretage undersøgelser af kvaliteten af den lokale paedagogiske ledelsespraksis. Der efterspørges undersøgelser, som raekker ud over lederens direkte indflydelse på undervisningskvaliteten og indfanger de brede organisatoriske kompetencer (Robinson & Gray, 2019).…”
Section: Paedagogisk Ledelseunclassified
“…A substantial body of research confirms that school leadership has a significant influence on student learning, second only to classroom teaching (Qian and Walker 2011; Louis et al 2010; Robinson et al 2009; Leithwood et al 2004). “In the last decade”, Day et al (2010) conclude, “more evidence has been uncovered to support our original finding that school leadership is second only to classroom teaching as an influence on pupil learning” (p. 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to distil key school leadership attributes, meta-analyses have focused on those capabilities which can be shown to have an impact on student learning and are therefore deemed to be particularly effective. Several researchers have identified specific high impact behaviours (Robinson et al 2009; Bryk et al 2010) which, in turn, underpin key leadership capabilities. Robinson’s work (2011) identified three key capabilities which relate to effective leadership – integrating deep pedagogical knowledge, analysing and solving complex problems, and building relational trust.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%