What do clinicians treat: Diagnoses or symptoms? The incremental validity of a symptom-based, dimensional characterization of emotional disorders in predicting medication prescription patterns

Abstract

Background Although practice guidelines are based on disorders specified in diagnostic manuals, such as the DSM, practitioners appear to follow symptoms when making treatment decisions. Psychiatric medication is generally prescribed in a transdiagnostic manner, further highlighting how symptoms, not diagnoses, often guide clinical practice. A quantitative approach to nosology promises to provide better guidance as it describes psychopathology dimensionally and its organization reflects patterns of covariation among symptoms. Aim To investigate whether a quantitative classification of emotional disorders can account for naturalistic medication prescription patterns better than traditional diagnoses. Methods Symptom dimensions and DSM diagnoses of emotional disorders, as well as prescribed medications, were assessed using interviews in a psychiatric outpatient sample (N= 318, mean age 42.5 years old, 59% female, 81% Caucasian). Results Each diagnosis was associated with prescription of multiple medication classes, and most medications were associated with multiple disorders. This was largely due to heterogeneity of clinical diagnoses, with narrow, homogenous dimensions underpinning diagnoses showing different medication profiles. Symptom dimensions predicted medication prescription better than DSM diagnoses, irrespective of whether this was examined broadly across all conditions, or focused on a specific disorder and medication indicated for it. Conclusions Psychiatric medication was prescribed in line with symptoms rather than DSM diagnoses. A quantitative approach to nosology may better reflect treatment planning and be a more effective guide to pharmacotherapy than traditional diagnoses. This adds to a diverse body of evidence about superiority of the quantitative system in practical applications and highlights its potential to improve psychiatric care.

Validity and utility of Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): I. Psychosis superspectrum

“…Clinical acceptability of HiTOP is consistent with the aim of the system to formalize and improve existing clinical decision‐making practices, as practitioners often rely on presenting signs and symptoms more than on traditional diagnoses 321 . Limitations on the utility of traditional diagnoses are further evident in clinicians forgoing criteria sets and employing abbreviated approaches in making diagnoses 322‐324 , as well as in extensive off‐label prescribing 325 .…”

Progress in achieving quantitative classification of psychopathology

“…Although traditional nosologies are framed by their category labels, dimensional approaches to psychopathology are also clearly part and parcel of clinical practice. Psychosocial and pharmacological intervention strategies often are effective because they track clinically salient clusters of symptom dimensions. Indeed, dimensional conceptualization and corresponding intervention strategies are arguably (if not always explicitly) the essence of clinical practice.…”

PTSD symptomics: network analyses in the field of psychotraumatology

“…Information on the patient’s particular story, and a focus on the specific symptoms the patient exhibits, may provide crucial information. While the importance of specific symptoms has long been acknowledged in clinical practice, where clinicians often base their treatment decisions on symptoms and not diagnoses (Kim & Ahn, 2002; Waszczuk et al, 2017), clinical sciences lag somewhat behind.…”