2003
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What do hospital consultants value about their jobs? A discrete choice experiment

Abstract: Objective To examine the strength of hospital consultants' preferences for various aspects of their work.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Os DCE têm sido aplicados em diversos países para fundamentar decisões em relação às políticas de saúde, planejamento e alocação de recursos, sobretudo para orientar políticas de atração e retenção de recursos humanos em saúde em áreas de maior necessidade 11,12,13,14 . Em anos recentes, registrou-se um uso crescente desta técnica 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Os DCE têm sido aplicados em diversos países para fundamentar decisões em relação às políticas de saúde, planejamento e alocação de recursos, sobretudo para orientar políticas de atração e retenção de recursos humanos em saúde em áreas de maior necessidade 11,12,13,14 . Em anos recentes, registrou-se um uso crescente desta técnica 15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…However, this may depend on study context (Ryan and Gerard, 2002), and there is some evidence that some respondents may not trade-off attributes, but adopt simpler decision heuristics (Scott, 2002;Lloyd, 2003). Although the choices presented to respondents are hypothetical, this allows researchers to have complete control over experimental design and ensures statistical robustness (Ubach et al, 2003). An important question with any stated preference technique is that of external validity: would respondents make the same choices in reality?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is common practise to drop subjects who fail (some) consistency checks (e.g. Ryan and Farrar, 2000;Ubach et al, 2003;Wordswort et al, 2006), Özdemir et al (2010) raise concern about this practise in case specific subgroups fail consistency tests disproportionately. Therefore, key characteristics of the full sample need to be compared to the values in the subsample after consistency analysis.…”
Section: Modelling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%