What do i want? The effects of individual aspiration and relational capability on collaboration preferences

Abstract

Research SummaryWe examine individuals' collaboration preferences in the Knowledge Transfer Network (KTN) for the UK plastics electronics sector. Using conjoint analysis, we investigate how aspiration gaps and relational capability affect the value placed on potential organizational collaborations. Aspiration gaps reflect individuals' perception of whether they are ahead or behind peers on their career trajectory, and relational capability captures three distinct dimensions: networking skills, openness to collaborate, and network awareness. Our findings suggest that positive and negative aspiration gaps augment preferences to form organizational partnerships. These effects are positively moderated by networking skills and openness and negatively moderated by network awareness. We discuss the implications of these findings for theories of partnership formation, scientific collaboration, and behavioral strategy. Managerial SummaryUniversity-Industry collaboration is important to the creation and application of new knowledge. Such collaboration requires individuals of different backgrounds to work together, which can be difficult. We investigate what drives individuals' preferences to collaborate. We find that individuals who consider themselves ahead or behind their peers are more favorable toward collaboration. We also find that networking skill and openness augment this positive collaboration disposition whereas awareness of the network members makes one more selective and reduces the proclivity to collaborate.

How do agile organizations contribute to environmental collaboration? Evidence from MNEs in Turkey

“…Moreover, organizations, especially those with large international operations (e.g., MNEs), exhibit dynamic operational practices in collaboration with their supply chain partners to provide sustainable environmental solutions (Clarke & Boersma, 2017;Vachon & Klassen, 2006). As collaborative processes reside in organizational mechanisms and also in individual capabilities, they may not be fully realized unless they are actually developed and implemented via various interorganizational activities exercised by individual managers (Schillebeeckx et al, 2016). Building on this view, the present study highlights the role of individual creativity and FWAs as mediating means to convert operational agility into environmental collaboration.…”

Social Value Creation and Relational Coordination in Public‐Private Collaborations

“…Public‐private collaborations are largely designed, managed, and run by professionals from both sectors, yet the role of individuals and how they may influence processes and actions has been largely ignored in extant studies (Schillebeeckx et al, ). One of the key challenges to create social value must then be to coordinate working, not just across public and private sectors, but managing highly professionalized individuals working across professional boundaries, and the need for mutual knowledge.…”

Exploring preferences for impact versus publications among UK business and management academics

“…Our question design was inspired by studies of managerial choice in innovation studies (Fischer andHenkel, 2012, 2013;Schillebeeckx et al, 2016) as well as research on risk preferences in behavioural economics (Cohen and Einav, 2007;Santos-Pinto et al, 2015). In these risk preference studies, individuals are offered a staged set of choices between two groups of outcomes with different degrees of risk.…”