2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00146-017-0765-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“What do others think?” An emic approach to participatory action research in Bangladesh

Abstract: Community informatics and Information and Communications Technology for Development research projects frequently focus on the appropriation of ICTs and the design of information systems to meet the needs of communities. Such projects typically involve a range of participants reflecting different cultures and depend for their success on the ability of the project to bridge differences. Using PROTIC (Participatory Research and Ownership with Technology, Information and Change), a 5-year collaborative project bet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the complexity of the project, and different anticipated outcomes, a mixed methods approach (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2011) was implemented to monitor how the project unfolded and the transformations it activated at the niche, regime, and even landscape levels. The methods included surveys, in-depth interviews with participants, ethnographic observations of off-line and online interactions, and the analysis of secondary data such as staff reports and internal documents (Sarrica et al, 2019; Stillman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Mixed Methods Approach and Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the complexity of the project, and different anticipated outcomes, a mixed methods approach (Creswell & Plano Clark, 2011) was implemented to monitor how the project unfolded and the transformations it activated at the niche, regime, and even landscape levels. The methods included surveys, in-depth interviews with participants, ethnographic observations of off-line and online interactions, and the analysis of secondary data such as staff reports and internal documents (Sarrica et al, 2019; Stillman et al, 2020).…”
Section: Mixed Methods Approach and Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking at Figure 2, this means advocating for blurring the ICT versus Development axis. There is a dearth of middle-range theorization capable of providing broader interpretative frameworks (Sarrica et al, 2017). Indeed, cross-fertilization is needed between CI, ICT4D and broader theories on ICTs to generate stronger interpretative frameworks.…”
Section: The Nonexistence Of Users the Link Between Theory And Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not stripping the concept of agency down to rational choice and optimal use of (ICT), is pertinent for efforts that seek to infuse research and development praxis with a focus on gender equality and women empowerment. Discussing the importance of emic and self-reflective approaches next to community engagement and technical results, Sarrica et al (2017) also emphasize how essential it is to be sensitive to research life as experienced by partners, which are culturally situated differently (Sarrica et al, 2017).…”
Section: Women Empowerment and Community Informaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%