2022
DOI: 10.1080/15472450.2022.2026773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What do riders say and where? The detection and analysis of eyewitness transit tweets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditional assessment of sentiment or customer satisfaction via social media employs a generic sentiment lexicon in the transit domain. Several authors have acknowledged that these types of generic lexicons are context dependent and can have a severe impact on the accuracy of the sentiment analysis if not used for a suitable topic (3,5,15). To improve the accuracy of the transit sentiment analysis, we used a hybrid approach to develop a transit-specific sentiment lexicon, adopting different techniques from recently conducted research on domain-specific sentiment lexicons (24)(25)(26)(27).…”
Section: Customer-oriented Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Traditional assessment of sentiment or customer satisfaction via social media employs a generic sentiment lexicon in the transit domain. Several authors have acknowledged that these types of generic lexicons are context dependent and can have a severe impact on the accuracy of the sentiment analysis if not used for a suitable topic (3,5,15). To improve the accuracy of the transit sentiment analysis, we used a hybrid approach to develop a transit-specific sentiment lexicon, adopting different techniques from recently conducted research on domain-specific sentiment lexicons (24)(25)(26)(27).…”
Section: Customer-oriented Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On-Time Performance Calculation. Trips were separated according to the group they belonged to, resulting in a total of 6,040,111 stop-level details for control routes (3,196,090 before the service change versus 2,844,021 after) and 4,465,801 stop-level details for treatment routes (2,015,586 before the service change versus 2,450,215 after). On-time performance was calculated for each group and period based on the proportion of schedule deviations that were within Calgary Transit's time window of 1 min early and 5 min late.…”
Section: Operational-oriented Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations