What Do Romanian Farmers Think about the Effects of Pesticides? Perceptions and Willingness to Pay for Bio-Pesticides

Abstract

Farmers’ knowledge and perception of risks associated with pesticides are core issues in adopting sustainable behavior related to pesticides. This study aimed to find out if Romanian farmers’ perceptions regarding the effects of conventional pesticides on pests, health, and the environment can predict farmers’ willingness to replace conventional pesticides with bio ones and to pay a higher price for the latter. This is the first investigation of Romanian farmers’ perceptions regarding pesticides, thus providing information useful both from the market and environmental protection perspectives. Binary logistic regression was performed to test the relationship between the perceived effect of pesticides, on the one side, and willingness to change conventional with bio-pesticides and willingness to pay for bio-pesticides, on the other side. It was found that the efficiency of conventional pesticides on combating pests and their effects on a farmer’s health can predict farmer willingness to replace conventional approaches with bio-pesticides. Conclusions disclose entry points for interventions aimed at improving communication and information strategies at the country level for raising awareness of the adverse effects of pesticide products, both at the food consumer and farmer levels.

Why don't smallholder farmers in Kenya use more biopesticides?

“…Indeed, when farmers seek chemical pesticides they are looking for quick and effective solutions to protect crops from pests and ensure farm productivity, with their decisions driven by product performance and effectiveness, closely followed by affordability and accessibility (supply by local dealers) 24 . Farmers' perceptions of effectiveness are important, especially considering the risks in trying a new product, from the initial cost of purchase to the subsequent risk of it not being effective against the pest 25 . With regards to chemical pesticides, farmers' perceptions of efficacy are central to selection and an important predictor of attitudes towards, and knowledge of, IPM and cultural control methods, as well as the importance of pesticide safety 23, 26 .…”

“…Farmers therefore continue using chemical pesticides despite an awareness of the risks, although farmers who had experienced health problems attributed to pesticides were more willing to pay for biopesticides than those who had not. Other studies report that farmers who have experienced adverse health effects due to chemical pesticide use demonstrate greater concern over health, higher risk perception of unsafe use of pesticides and greater willingness to use biopesticides 25, 40, 41 …”

Knowledge and Attitude of Malaysian Fruit Growers on Integrated Pest Management (IPM)

“…This is because they think that the complete elimination of pests is required to prevent outbreaks, instead of merely suppressing the pest population to an acceptable level (El-Shafie, 2020). Farmers might also perceive that the use of chemical pesticides is the key factor to ensure high yield, not knowing that the use of synthetic pesticide could only help to reduce crop losses rather than increasing the potential yield (Petrescu-Mag et. al., 2019;Popp, Pető & Nagy, 2013).…”

Dispute Resolution and Collaborative Decision-Making: What Accounts for Their Effectiveness? The Case of Romania

“…Its environmental problems are characteristic of former communist countries going through a transition process towards a free market economy. The overuse of natural resources, high rates of urbanization, and chemical use in agriculture have contributed to widespread environmental degradation [30][31][32]. After Romania's accession to the European Union (EU) in 2007, the environmental problems started to receive attention, especially due to the country's duty to harmonize its legislation with EU environmental legislation, as well as due to the notable empowerment of NGOs, which increasingly engage in the protection of the environment and civil society.…”