2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100798
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What do teachers need? Math and special education teacher educators’ perceptions of essential teacher knowledge and experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies tended to focus in exploring SE teachers' knowledge, which consists 10 of the articles reviewed (Aiyeleso, 2016;Rosas & Cambell, 2010;van Garderen et al, 2013;Brownell et al, 2010;Feng & Sass, 2013;Martin, 2018;Brown, 2019;Greer & Meyen, 2009;Aydemir, 2013;Hinton et al, 2015). We found five studies which compared SE teachers' knowledge and general mathematics teachers' knowledge (Sheppard & Wieman, 2020;Goldman & Gilmour, 2020;Weiss et al, 2018;Alazemi, 2018), while only one study compared SE teachers' knowledge between pre-service and in service teachers (Flores et al, 2010). Finally, three articles focused on pre-service teachers' knowledge in mathematics (Griffin et al, 2009;Ekstam et al, 2017 b ;Rosas & Cambell;.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies tended to focus in exploring SE teachers' knowledge, which consists 10 of the articles reviewed (Aiyeleso, 2016;Rosas & Cambell, 2010;van Garderen et al, 2013;Brownell et al, 2010;Feng & Sass, 2013;Martin, 2018;Brown, 2019;Greer & Meyen, 2009;Aydemir, 2013;Hinton et al, 2015). We found five studies which compared SE teachers' knowledge and general mathematics teachers' knowledge (Sheppard & Wieman, 2020;Goldman & Gilmour, 2020;Weiss et al, 2018;Alazemi, 2018), while only one study compared SE teachers' knowledge between pre-service and in service teachers (Flores et al, 2010). Finally, three articles focused on pre-service teachers' knowledge in mathematics (Griffin et al, 2009;Ekstam et al, 2017 b ;Rosas & Cambell;.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elements of the game are considered, namely the score, the winners, and the losers. With these elements, students become more enthusiastic because the individual factors are also considered [44]. Instructions and explanations are also made complete so that students can make connections between game terminology and mathematical terminology [45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite many studies that have been done on classroom participation assessment, its significance in teaching and learning (Ketabi and Ketabi, 2014;Morningstar et al;2015;Sheppard and Wieman, 2020;Weaver and Qi, 2005), and the awareness of teachers and students of the positive outcomes of classroom participation and its impact on students' grades, there is little student participation in our language schools classrooms. Unfortunately, despite students' low participation, teachers give them inflated scores that are not correlated with their real abilities or final scores.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%