What Do Trade Agreements Really Do?

Abstract

Economists have a tendency to associate “free trade agreements” all too closely with “free trade.” They may be unaware of some of the new (and often problematic) beyond-the-boarder features of current trade agreements. As trade agreements have evolved and gone beyond import tariffs and quotas into regulatory rules and harmonization— intellectual property, health and safety rules, labor standards, investment measures, investor–state dispute settlement procedures, and others—they have become harder to fit into received economic theory. It is possible that rather than neutralizing the protectionists, trade agreements may empower a different set of rent-seeking interests and politically well-connected firms—international banks, pharmaceutical companies, and multinational firms. Trade agreements could still result in freer, mutually beneficial trade, through exchange of market access. They could result in the global upgrading of regulations and standards, for labor, say, or the environment. But they could also produce purely redistributive outcomes under the guise of “freer trade.” As trade agreements become less about tariffs and nontariff barriers at the border and more about domestic rules and regulations, economists might do well to worry more about the latter possibility.

Are Chinese Acquirers Discriminated against in Cross‐border Mergers and Acquisitions? An Analysis Based on Covered Transactions Filed with CFIUS

“…Second, in the field of international economics, there is a long history of studies examining the behavior of economic nationalism in which a government has a marked home bias toward domestic ownership and control in economic activities (Knight, 1935;Hayek, 1937;Olson, 1987;Helleiner and Pickel, 2005). Although most of the studies related to economic nationalism have focused on trade protectionism (Colantone and Stanig, 2018;Rodrik, 2018), some scholars have extended the study of economic nationalism to the field of cross-border capital flows. Morse and Shive (2010), for example, argued that the home bias in international equity investments is closely linked to patriotism.…”

The Impact of Trade Policy Decisions on Social Justice

“…This means that trade liberalization produces economic gains that could be redistributed in such a way as to make everyone economically better off. However, see Rodrik (2018) for the proposal that contemporary trade agreements mostly produce redistributive outcomes instead of efficiency gains. 18 Economists tend to refer to a trade-independent concept of distributive justice in which trade is merely an instrument for achieving the society's aims.…”

“…A tariff requires consumers to pay a tax on goods from foreign producers, but not domestic producers.12 Tesón includes 'sanitary rules' and 'national security requirements' on his list of possible forms for protectionist laws(2012, p. 126). It will only be clear in a sub-set of cases that these policies aim to benefit domestic producers, rather than aiming to pursue the society's interests in public health and national security.13 SeeRodrik (2018) on the distance between trade theory and the content of contemporary trade agreements, and for his argument that many of these agreements have greater effects on distributional outcomes than on efficiency.…”

The development trinity: How regional integration impacts growth, inequality and poverty

“…Other, more complex taxonomies propose further effects working through import and export diversion, and import–export substitution within members. Some authors, for example, Rodrik (), argue that looking only at trade creation and diversion is an insufficient way to evaluate RTAs.…”