2019
DOI: 10.1177/1354068819845100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What do voters do when they prefer a leader from another party?

Abstract: There is little research on voters who display incongruent preferences, that is, those who prefer a leader from another party than their preferred one. We address two questions. How many voters prefer a leader from another party? Do these incongruent voters vote for their preferred party or leader? We use the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) data sets covering 83 legislative elections over a time period of 20 years (1996–2016). We find that 17% of the electorate typically prefer a leader from anot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We exclude regions for the sake of parsimony, but it is worth noting that their inclusion does not alter our findings.11 The question was: "Which party did you vote for?" It is not impossible that some people vote for a particular local candidate or a preferred leader from another party, but it is not the case for the vast majority of voters(Blais and Daoust 2017;Daoust et al 2020).12 Compared to actual electoral outcomes, the PLQ and the CAQ are slightly underestimated, which is common in pre-election forecasting and does not entail major implications for statistical inferences(Durand 2013;Pinard 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We exclude regions for the sake of parsimony, but it is worth noting that their inclusion does not alter our findings.11 The question was: "Which party did you vote for?" It is not impossible that some people vote for a particular local candidate or a preferred leader from another party, but it is not the case for the vast majority of voters(Blais and Daoust 2017;Daoust et al 2020).12 Compared to actual electoral outcomes, the PLQ and the CAQ are slightly underestimated, which is common in pre-election forecasting and does not entail major implications for statistical inferences(Durand 2013;Pinard 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Political leaders have gained increasing relevance for the electoral success of their parties over the last few decades (Garzia 2011;Lobo and Curtice 2014;Lobo 2018;Lobo and Ferreira da Silva 2017;Garzia et al 2018;Garzia and Ferreira da Silva 2021). The increasing personalization of the electoral field, which is controversially related to the presidentialization of political life (Poguntke and Webb 2005) as the prime minister or the cabinet have gained political powers, is the result of at least three trends (McAllister 2007;Karvonen 2010;Garzia 2011;Daoust et al 2021). The first is the growing importance of electronic media, especially television, for political communication, which focus on leaders or persons rather than on parties.…”
Section: Leaders Emotions and Voters' Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this group, we cannot ascertain whether party or leader motivations are more important. Finally, incongruent voters are respondents who did not rank either the party or the leader of the party they voted for as their favorite (for similar approaches of classification, see Blais and Gschwend, 2010; Daoust et al, 2021; Quinlan and O’Malley, 2018). For a concrete example of this classification scheme, please consult Appendix E.…”
Section: Identifying Leader Inclined Votingmentioning
confidence: 99%