2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2006.00653.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What do we know about partnership with service users and carers in social work education and how robust is the evidence base?

Abstract: Partnership work with service users and carers in social work education is a policy requirement, and it is also central to the anti-oppressive and rights-based values of social work. This paper reports research findings which are drawn from an educational context, but are also relevant to the wider field of health and social care. The research team undertook a systematic knowledge review using the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Coordinating Centre system, which had been used in health and edu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This goes against the requirements for social work education set out by the Department of Health and can also lead to a loss of potentially great benefits for students. Even though the evidence base is still developing (Taylor and Le Riche, 2006), service user involvement is widely held as an educational experience valued by students (Waterson and Morris, 2005;Sadd, 2011). The benefits of such involvement can potentially have a transformative effect on students' preconceptions, value base and understanding of lived experience (Frisby, 2001;Rush, 2008).…”
Section: Ideological Underpinnings and Dilemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This goes against the requirements for social work education set out by the Department of Health and can also lead to a loss of potentially great benefits for students. Even though the evidence base is still developing (Taylor and Le Riche, 2006), service user involvement is widely held as an educational experience valued by students (Waterson and Morris, 2005;Sadd, 2011). The benefits of such involvement can potentially have a transformative effect on students' preconceptions, value base and understanding of lived experience (Frisby, 2001;Rush, 2008).…”
Section: Ideological Underpinnings and Dilemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Taylor and Le Riche (2006), the search for some such conceptual clarity in relation to partnership has in practice proved to be somewhat elusive. One might begin such an exercise through the act of distinguishing different kinds of partnership such as those of a marriage or business.…”
Section: Lexical Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, coupled with a theoretical orientation that has tended to valorize a community of practice approach (e.g., Lave & Wenger, 2002), may have also contributed to this (Guile, 2010;Hughes, Jewson, & Unwin, 2007;Roberts, 2006). Such critical readings of partnership that have been undertaken, such as Hopwood's (2014) analysis of partnership in an Australian healthcare context, suggest that there is widespread confusion around the very concept of partnership itself and a need for greater theorization in the light of this (Taylor & Le Riche, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The workshop provides an example of how service user and carer involvement in social work education has evolved from a primary focus on sharing personal stories to active participation in student skill development (Taylor & Le Riche, 2006, Sadd, 2011, MacSporran, 2015. Whilst, there is, undoubtedly, value in the former, commitment to service user involvement can support the emergence of a culture in which service users can grow in confidence and develop their ability to engage in more challenging learning opportunities to the benefit of student learning and development.…”
Section: Conclusion and Implication For Future Practicementioning
confidence: 99%