What Do We Know About LGBTQIA+ Mental Health in India? A Review of Research From 2009 to 2019

Abstract

<jats:p> Background: The period from 2009 to 2019 has seen a lot of conversation about issues of LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/ questioning, intersex, asexual, and others) individuals in India, but they continue to be a group showing poor health equity. </jats:p><jats:p> Objective: This descriptive content review attempted to explore 5 questions: what is the nature of existing research on mental health of LGBTQIA+ individuals, what are the pathways that contribute to mental health issues, whether the existing health facilities mitigate or facilitate these pathways, what are the interventions proposed for this group, and what are the gaps in research that can be addressed in the next decade. </jats:p><jats:p> Method: “Mental health aspects” were described as variables relevant to understanding individuals’ cognitions, emotions, and behavior. We searched for literature in online journal databases, in archives of the most prominent journals, on websites of prominent LGBTQIA+ organizations, and through cross-referencing of papers obtained. The data were abstracted and coded into themes and subthemes. We found 22 reviews and reports, 4 viewpoints and comments, 7 editorials, 1 conference proceeding, and 60 original articles. </jats:p><jats:p> Conclusions: Prevalence studies reveal that LGBTQIA+ individuals were found to show high rates of mental health concerns, and that the adapted minority stress model may be a crucial pathway for the same. Lived experiences, factors related to mental well-being, and societal attitudes have also been studied. Intervention studies are relatively fewer, and certain subgroups of LGBTQIA+ identities are less represented in research. Gaps in research were identified and recommendations for research in the coming decade were proposed. </jats:p>

“Their Untold Stories…”: Lived Experiences of Being a Transgender (Hijra), A Qualitative Study From India

“…Wandrekar and Nigudkar, in their detailed review of mental health related to the LGBT community from 2000 to 2019, mentioned the dearth of research regarding their societal needs, lived experiences, and factors related to their well-being. 8 This study essentially attempted to explore that under-stated area. On the basis of the analysis of the transcripts, mainly 4 subordinate themes and 2 superordinate themes could be identified.…”

Impact of cancer diagnosis on emotional well-being and quality of life on LGBT population in India and across Europe; A report drawn on the bases of experience and bird’s eye view of a psycho-oncologist

“…This community faces unique challenges here as well, sometimes more serious than anywhere else, but in the long run, these challenges are mostly practical and in most of the cases tangible and thus resolvable; besides the support from the government and political system and therefore society as a whole makes the situations and scenarios different here. [1][2][3][4][5] Both in India or west, any gay, lesbian, or anyone belonging to the LGBT community, after hearing "The Bad News of BIG C" experience the same emotions and shock waves, however as far as Impact of cancer diagnosis on emotional well-being and quality of life on LGBT population in India and across Europe; A report drawn on the bases of experience and bird's eye view of a psychooncologist my experience in India goes, Indian patients feel these emotions to more extreme levels and their implications are highly significant. Fear of getting the sexual orientation disclosed after the diagnosis, fear of being judged by clinicians, and in extreme cases fear of being disowned by family and caregivers are the primary apprehensions or stressors that can profoundly impact the mental well-being and thus the quality of life of such patients.…”

An eHealth Intervention for Promoting COVID-19 Knowledge and Protective Behaviors and Reducing Pandemic Distress Among Sexual and Gender Minorities: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (#SafeHandsSafeHearts)

“…A 30% increase postintervention attains clinical/public health significance [ 78 ] and a substantial effect size. For (3) psychological distress (depression, anxiety, social isolation), we use a baseline depression rate of 50% (based on a systematic review [ 19 ]) as a proxy, with an expected 30% reduction [ 79 ]. Using Stata-16, the required sample size to detect significant differences between the waitlist control and immediate-intervention groups, with power of 80%, α of .05 for the 95% CI, and a two-tailed test, ranged from 78 to 86.…”

“…In India, national HIV prevalence among men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender people is 20-fold higher than that of the general population [ 16 - 18 ]. Depression and alcohol dependence incidence is 5-fold higher among lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people than that among the general population [ 19 - 21 ]. Thailand has a 10-fold higher HIV prevalence among MSM versus the general population [ 22 ].…”