What Do We Really Know About the Safety of Tai Chi?: A Systematic Review of Adverse Event Reports in Randomized Trials

Abstract

Objective Systematically review frequency and quality of adverse event (AE) reports in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of Tai Chi (TC). Data Sources Electronic searches of PubMed/MEDLINE and additional databases from inception through March 2013 of English-language RCTs. Search terms were tai chi, taiji, tai chi chuan. Data were independently extracted by two investigators. Study Selection We included all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that were published in English and used Tai Chi as an intervention. Inclusion and exclusion of studies were reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data Extraction Eligible RCTs were categorized with respect to AE reporting: 1) No mention of protocols for monitoring AEs or reports of AEs; 2) Reports of AEs either with or without explicit protocols for monitoring AEs. Data Synthesis 153 eligible RCTs were identified, most targeting older adults. Only 50 eligible trials (33%) included reporting of AEs, and of these, only 18 trials (12% overall) also reported an explicit AE monitoring protocol. Protocols varied with respect to rigor of systematic monitoring in both Tai Chi and comparison groups. Reported AEs were typically minor and expected, and primarily musculoskeletal related (e.g., knee and back pain); no intervention-related serious AEs were reported. Conclusions Tai Chi is unlikely to result in serious adverse events, but may be associated with minor musculoskeletal aches and pains. However, poor and inconsistent reporting of AEs greatly limits the conclusions that can be drawn regarding the safety of Tai Chi.

Advances in rehabilitation for chronic diseases: improving health outcomes and function

“…Increased awareness of posture and breathing improves participants’ ability to anticipate and manage their symptoms, decreasing the risk of precipitating a vicious cycle of breathlessness and anxiety. These modalities have been shown to be safe in patients with chronic heart failure, coronary artery disease (recovering from bypass surgery and myocardial infarction), frailty, arthritis, and vestibular disease 127. These activities can be performed at home, can be done seated, and may be enjoyable alternatives to walking or using exercise equipment.…”

Effect of traditional Chinese exercise on gait and balance for stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis

“…Whether traditional Chinese exercise is more beneficial in improving physical function in patients with stroke than other exercise therapy or without intervention is presently vague. A systematic review of adverse event reports in randomized trials [29] has reported certain adverse effects. These effects include muscle problems [30][31][32] and dizziness or hypotension [33].…”

Design and methods of the Gentle Cardiac Rehabilitation Study — A behavioral study of tai chi exercise for patients not attending cardiac rehabilitation

“…Tai chi has been shown to be safe in older and deconditioned individuals and in patients with coronary heart disease. (23, 42) No tai chi related side effects have been reported even among high-risk patients (i.e., those recovering from coronary bypass surgery (43) or with heart failure and ejection fraction <40% and NYHA class up to III). (17, 40) The most common adverse effect of tai chi practice is muscle soreness (usually mild and lasting only a few days).…”

“…(18–20) First, it can be practiced safely by elderly and deconditioned individuals. (21–23) Tai chi gentle exercise training may also be more attractive to women, who typically dislike the exercise training offered in CRs. (24) Second, since tai chi practice does not require any particular equipment, it can be practiced at any time and place, thus facilitating adherence.…”