2003
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9973.00275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What do we Want from a Theory of Happiness?

Abstract: I defend a methodology for theorizing about happiness. I reject three methods: conceptual analysis; scientific naturalism; and the ''pure normative adequacy'' approach, where the best conception of happiness is the one that best fills a role in moral theory. The concept of happiness is a folk notion employed by laypersons who have various practical interests in the matter, and theories of happiness should respect this fact. I identify four such interests in broad terms and then argue for a set of desiderata th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
41
0
12

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
41
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of happiness, alongside social capital, has played a key role in recent social sciences studies and has been applied more frequently (2). According to Haybron (2003), there are 4 reasons which encourage social scientists to study the concept of happiness: its significance in decision-making, evaluation of family's position, prediction of behavioral patterns, and explaining behaviors (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of happiness, alongside social capital, has played a key role in recent social sciences studies and has been applied more frequently (2). According to Haybron (2003), there are 4 reasons which encourage social scientists to study the concept of happiness: its significance in decision-making, evaluation of family's position, prediction of behavioral patterns, and explaining behaviors (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the notion of 'happiness' has vexed philosophers for centuries (Haybron, 2003), the lack of research in this area probably arises from problems in defining such an elusive, multifaceted concept. In health research happiness is often subsumed under the umbrella term 'Quality of Life' to indicate global life satisfaction and is therefore different from the momentary assessment of a subjective emotional state such as positive or negative mood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a huge philosophical, psychological and economic literature aiming at defining the constituents of happiness (for recent examples, Haybron, 2000;Haybron, 2003;Simsek, 2008) and at identifying the moral norms for individuals to achieve it (for recent examples, Degli Antoni, 2009; Konow and Earley, 2008;Martin, 2008;Binswanger, 2006;Kaun, 2005). The first purpose of this paper is to provide a simple analytical model in order to summarise the main features of happiness and the main ethical approaches suggested in the literature, under very general assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%