2020
DOI: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1809714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What do you hear? The effect of stadium noise on football players’ passing performances

Abstract: Stadium noisecreated by spectators and fansplays a critical part in the reality of professional sports. Due to a lack of research on the impact of these auditory cues and multimodal environments on motor performance, it is currently unclear how professional athletes experience and perceive stadium noise and how this potentially affects performance in practice. In order to explore the effect of stadium noise on athletes' performance, this paper presents an experimental design using the unique and standardised f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 The assumption is that the orientation of eye movements in the practice landscape captures visual focus and attention. On the other hand, advanced training technologies, such as robotic (football) training machines like the 'Footbonaut' 29 or VR-based training systems 17 may allow researchers, coaches and athletes to manipulate various task and environmental constraints and co-design practice contexts, based on data from performance analytics. 2.…”
Section: Technological Equipment Modification and Training Machinerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 The assumption is that the orientation of eye movements in the practice landscape captures visual focus and attention. On the other hand, advanced training technologies, such as robotic (football) training machines like the 'Footbonaut' 29 or VR-based training systems 17 may allow researchers, coaches and athletes to manipulate various task and environmental constraints and co-design practice contexts, based on data from performance analytics. 2.…”
Section: Technological Equipment Modification and Training Machinerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Which were the driving mechanisms behind the results found by Bryson et al (2020) regarding the games behind closed doors and yellow cards? One explanation lies in the lack of stimuli from the spectators, but the correlation could also be attributed to athletes and their change in tactics due to the lack of noise (see e.g., the recent experiment on the distribution of yellow cards by Otte, Millar, & Klatt, 2020). On the one hand, the referee could be influenced by the spectators, on the other hand, however, the "away athletes" could also appear to be more aggressive and the referee's decision would thus be a necessary and logical, undistorted consequence to ensure game control and management (cf.…”
Section: Home Advantage and Disadvantage: Social Influence Of Active Spectatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tests were done with three sounds: negative, positive, and silence. Similar to Arıkan's (2010) study, the vuvuzela sound was the negative sound and the sound of fans cheering was the positive sound, following Otte et al (2020). Sounds were amplified in a sound system at 80 dB.…”
Section: Sound Protocolmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…In a study on this subject, Arslan et al (2002) revealed that the most annoying types of sounds and noise for athletes are the cheers of the fans (34.8%), the sounds made by the fans with sound makers (30.5%), and the collective whistling sounds of the fans (29.8%). In a study conducted by Otte et al (2020), football players pass faster while listening to negative sounds and silence than positive sounds.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation