What Does Big Data Mean for Wearable Sensor Systems?

Abstract

SummaryObjectives:The aim of this paper is to discuss how recent developments in the field of big data may potentially impact the future use of wearable sensor systems in healthcare. Methods: The article draws on the scientific literature to support the opinions presented by the IMIA Wearable Sensors in Healthcare Working Group. Results: The following is discussed: the potential for wearable sensors to generate big data; how complementary technologies, such as a smartphone, will augment the concept of a wearable sensor and alter the nature of the monitoring data created; how standards would enable sharing of data and advance scientific progress. Importantly, attention is drawn to statistical inference problems for which big datasets provide little assistance, or may hinder the identification of a useful solution. Finally, a discussion is presented on risks to privacy and possible negative consequences arising from intensive wearable sensor monitoring. Conclusions: Wearable sensors systems have the potential to generate datasets which are currently beyond our capabilities to easily organize and interpret. In order to successfully utilize wearable sensor data to infer wellbeing, and enable proactive health management, standards and ontologies must be developed which allow for data to be shared between research groups and between commercial systems, promoting the integration of these data into health information systems. However, policy and regulation will be required to ensure that the detailed nature of wearable sensor data is not misused to invade privacies or prejudice against individuals.

Use of nonintrusive sensor‐based information and communication technology for real‐world evidence for clinical trials in dementia

“…Approaches for semi-automatic verification of data quality derived from ICT-based RWE procedures are the subject of active research. Specific problems of data quality for wearable sensors may, for instance, arise from poor device placement [ 75 ] and lack of a gold standard. In addition, a low signal-to-noise ratio may blur signal structure.…”

Big data for bipolar disorder

“…There are a variety of passive monitoring projects for bipolar disorder, mostly in the pilot phase, with examples shown in Table 5 . The implementation of routine passive monitoring for large numbers of patients faces many hurdles, including patient acceptance, physician usability, and processing large volumes of data from sensors (Redmond et al 2014 ; Muench 2014 ). Many passive monitoring projects involve smartphones.…”

“…Many passive monitoring projects involve smartphones. Both the differing physical characteristics of the standard devices available to consumers such as sensor accuracy and memory size, and methods selected for analysis may impact the findings (Banaee et al 2013 ; Redmond et al 2014 ). The sales of smartphones are flat in developed countries with saturation reached, and usage patterns vary among countries (Thomas 2014 , Waters 2015 ).…”

Driving Innovation in Health Systems through an Apps-Based Information Economy

“…However, the reality of the growth in the “wearables” industry (e.g., Fitbit or Apple Watch) has vastly outstripped any standardization efforts (Redmond et al, 2014), which suggests that the initial sets of apps for these data streams will remain confined to their respective platforms and also integrate with EHR data in very limited ways. Patient-driven open data efforts (Chiauzzi et al, 2015) may be required to enforce cross-platform standardization.…”