2017
DOI: 10.1111/dpr.12341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What does Brunei teach us about using Human Development Index rankings as a policy tool?

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, although the country has a good basic infrastructure, it lacks the high‐level infrastructure: top class health care, a regional leading university, and a better transport network. The country is also a very unequal one, ranked 94th in the world; such inequality would suggest that many have only had limited benefit from the oil and gas boom (Michael, ). Again, mapped against Witt and Redding's (, ) taxonomy of key institutional features that differentiate the different Asian economies, from ownership and governance to the financial system to employment relations, would suggest that it has significantly more in common with the less developed Asian economies than the mature ones (Michael, ; Singh et al, ; c.f., Fainshmidt et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, although the country has a good basic infrastructure, it lacks the high‐level infrastructure: top class health care, a regional leading university, and a better transport network. The country is also a very unequal one, ranked 94th in the world; such inequality would suggest that many have only had limited benefit from the oil and gas boom (Michael, ). Again, mapped against Witt and Redding's (, ) taxonomy of key institutional features that differentiate the different Asian economies, from ownership and governance to the financial system to employment relations, would suggest that it has significantly more in common with the less developed Asian economies than the mature ones (Michael, ; Singh et al, ; c.f., Fainshmidt et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through HDI analysis, we can also compare well-being between countries or regions, providing essential insights for cross-border comparisons [2][3][4]. HDI study results also play a role in planning and policymaking, helping governments determine development priorities, resource allocation, and more effective strategy changes [5,6]. The HDI is essential to understanding, monitoring, and improving the population's quality of life and informing more effective development policies [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%