What Does It Take to Establish that a World Is Uninhabited Prior to Exploitation? A Question of Ethics as well as Science

Abstract

Abstract:If we find life on another world, it will be an extremely important discovery and we will have to take great care not to do anything that might endanger that life. If the life we find is sentient we will have moral obligations to that life. Whether it is sentient or not, we have a duty to ourselves to preserve it as a study object, and also because it would be commonly seen as valuable in its own right. In addition to this we would also have a duty to our fellow humans and other earthly life forms not to expose them to danger by advertently or inadvertently exposing them to potentially harmful space organisms. When space exploration turns into exploitation it will therefore be important to be able to show that a world that is up for exploitation is uninhabited before the exploitation starts. Showing that a world is uninhabited is, however, a different kind of task than showing that it is inhabited. The latter task can be accomplished through one positive finding but it is not clear how to go about the former task. In this paper I suggest that it is a gradual process asymptotically approaching certainty rather than a discovery in the traditional sense of the word. It has to be handled in two steps. The first is to connect degree of certainty with research setup. The second is to decide how certain we need to be. The first step is about the number, diversity and quality of observations. The second step is a decision we have to make based on the purpose of the investigation. The purpose and therefore the degree of certainty needed to establish that a world is uninhabited will be different for a world that is up for exploitation than for a world that is not. In the latter case it is only a matter of epistemic values. In the former case also ethical values have to be considered.

Developing ecospheres on transiently habitable planets: the genesis project

“…Remote sensing of exo-planetary biosignatures from earth is possible (Des Marais et al 2002), albeit only to a certain degree. An even more daring task would be to actually prove that a world is uninhabited (Persson 2014). It is hence clear that the final decision to go ahead must be taken autonomously by the on-board artificial intelligence.…”

How Will the Emerging Plurality of Lives Change How We Conceive of and Relate to Life?

“…A second origin of life will thus affect how we define life, but also our attitudes to life, and perhaps even how we live our lives [36][37][38][39][40][41][42]. This in turn will have many practical implications that need legislation and policy decisions [43][44][45][46][47]. In a nutshell, it might be one of the most revolutionary events in the history of our species, and it may well happen within our lifetimes.…”

The need of an ethics of planetary sustainability

“…It includes the question, whether only an actual habitat should be protected or also a potential habitat, understood either as a candidate for a future habitat or as an unknown actual habitat. It is rather difficult to exclude the potential existence of life on a celestial body totally (Persson 2014). Maybe already on our voyages to Mars we can find traces of extraterrestrial life.…”